Are invasives bigger? a global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs

Buckley, Yvonne M., Downey, Paul, Fowler, Simon V., Hill, Richard, Memmot, Jane, Norambuena, Hernan, Pitcairn, Mike, Shaw, Richard, Sheppard, Andrew W., Winks, Chris, Wittenberg, Ruediger and Rees, Mark (2003) Are invasives bigger? a global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs. Ecology, 84 6: 1434-1440. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1434:AIBAGS]2.0.CO;2

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ9569_OA.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 83.88KB 0

Author Buckley, Yvonne M.
Downey, Paul
Fowler, Simon V.
Hill, Richard
Memmot, Jane
Norambuena, Hernan
Pitcairn, Mike
Shaw, Richard
Sheppard, Andrew W.
Winks, Chris
Wittenberg, Ruediger
Rees, Mark
Title Are invasives bigger? a global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs
Journal name Ecology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0012-9658
Publication date 2003-06-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1434:AIBAGS]2.0.CO;2
Open Access Status File (Publisher version)
Volume 84
Issue 6
Start page 1434
End page 1440
Total pages 7
Place of publication Washington, DC, United States
Publisher Ecological Society of America
Language eng
Abstract We explored the spatial structure of seed size variation and tested whether seed size differed between native and exotic populations in two invasive species. Seed of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom) is significantly heavier in its exotic range, whereas seed of Ulex europaeus (European gorse) is no different between ranges. This result suggests that seed size in C. scoparius is either adaptively or phenotypically responsive to conditions in its exotic range or that plants with large seeds were preferentially introduced. We found that modern ornamental broom seed was no bigger than seed from natural or naturalized populations, suggesting that large seed size in the exotic range is not due to preferential introduction of ornamental varieties with large seeds. Most previous studies of trait differences between native and exotic ranges in invasive species have not taken variation throughout the ranges into account. This is the most comprehensive survey of seed size variation in any species, and the first time that variation in a trait of an invasive species has been studied from individual plant level up to global ranges. Demographic rates can be affected by seed attributes making this study an important first step in understanding how population processes may differ between native and exotic ranges.
Keyword Cytisus scoparius
evolutionary change
invasive plants
linear mixed effects models
phenotypic plasticity
seed size variation
Ulex europaeus
References Agrawal, A. 2001. Transgenerational consequences of plant responses to herbivory: an adaptive maternal effect? The American Naturalist 157:555-569. Amsellem, L., J. L. Noyer, T. Le Bourgeois, and M. Hossaert-McKey. 2000. Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Molecular Ecology 9:443-455. Bingham, J. 1966. Paternal effect on grain size in wheat. Nature 209: 940-41. Blossey, B., and R. Nutzold. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83:887-889. Cipollini, M. L., and E. W. Stiles. 1991. Seed predation by the bean weevil Acanthoscelides obtectus on Phaseolus species - consequences for seed size, early growth and reproduction. Oikos 60:205-214. Clements, D. R., D. J. Peterson, and R. Prasad. 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds. 112. Ulex europaeus L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81:325-337. Eriksson, O. 1999. Seed size variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herb Convallaria majalis. Acta Oecologica 20:61-66. Harper, J. L., P. H. Lovell, and K. G. Moore. 1970. The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:327-356. Holm, L., J. Doll, E. Holm, J. Pancho, and J. Herberger. 1997. World weeds: Natural histories and distribution. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Canada. Hosking, J. R., J. M. B. Smith, and A. W. Sheppard. 1996. The Biology of Australian Weeds 28. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link subsp. scoparius. Plant Protection Quarterly 11:102-108. Howe, H. F., and W. M. Richter. 1982. Effects of seed size on seedling size in Virola surinamensis; a within and between tree analysis. Oecologia 53:347-351. Kass, E., and Wink, M. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in the Papilionoideae (Family Leguminosae) based on nucleotide sequences of cpDNA (rbcL) and ncDNA (ITS 1 and 2). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 65-88. Kigel, J. 1992. Diaspore heteromorphism and germination in populations of the ephemeral Hedypnois rhagadioloides (L) Schmidt, F.W. (Asteraceae) inhabiting a geographic range of increasing aridity. Acta Oecologia 13: 45-53. Leishman, M. R., M. Westoby, and E. Jurado. 1995. Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison among five temperate floras. Journal of Ecology 83:517-530. Mazer, S. J., and L. M. Wolfe. 1992. Planting density influences the expression of genetic variation in seed mass in wild radish (Raphanus sativus L.: Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 79:1185-1193. Memmott, J., S. V. Fowler, Q. Paynter, A. W. Sheppard, and P. Syrett. 2000. The invertebrate fauna on broom, Cytisus scoparius, in two native and two exotic habitats. Acta Oecologica 21:213-222. Michaels, H. J., B. Benner, A.P. Hartgerink, T. D. Lee. 1988. Seed size variation: magnitude, distribution, and ecological correlates. Evolutionary Ecology 2:157-166. Moegenburg, S. M. 1996. Sabal palmetto seed size: Causes of variation, choices of predators, and consequences for seedlings. Oecologia 106:539-543. Noble, I. 1989. Attributes of invaders and the invading process: terrestrial and vascular plants. Pages 301-313 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester. Parker, I. M. 1997. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78:1457-1470. Paz, H., S. J. Mazer, and M. Martinez-Ramos. 1999. Seed mass, seedling emergence, and environmental factors in seven rain forest Psychotria (Rubiaceae). Ecology 80:1594-1606. Peterson, D. J., and R. Prasad. 1998. The biology of Canadian weeds. 109. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78:497-504. Pinheiro, J. C., and D. M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York. Rees, M. 1996. Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 351:1299-1308. Rees, M., and R. L. Hill. 2001. Large-scale disturbances, biological control and the dynamics of gorse populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:364-377. Rees, M., and Q. Paynter. 1997. Biological control of Scotch broom: modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1203-1221. Rees, M., and M. Westoby. 1997. Game-theoretical evolution of seed mass in multi-species ecological models. Oikos 78:116-126. Richardson, R. G., and R. L. Hill. 1998. The Biology of Australian Weeds 34. Ulex europaeus L. Plant Protection Quarterly 13:46-58. Roach, D. A. and R. D. Wulff. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:209-235. Schmid, B., and C. Dolt. 1994. Effects of maternal and paternal environment and genotype on offspring phenotype in Solidago altissima L. Evolution 48:1525-1549. Shaanker, R. U., K. N. Ganeshaiah, and K. S. Bawa. 1988. Parent-offspring conflict, sibling rivalry, and brood size patterns in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:177-205. Smith, J. M. B., and R. L. Harlen. 1991. Preliminary observations on the seed dynamics of broom (Cytisus scoparius) at Barrington Tops, New South Wales. Plant Protection Quarterly 6:73-78. Telenius, A., and P. Torstensson. 1999. Seed type and seed size variation in the heteromorphic saltmarsh annual Spergula salina along the coast of Sweden. Plant Biology 1:585-593. Thibaud, C., and D. Simberloff. 2001. Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? The American Naturalist 157:231-236. Venable, D. L. 1992. Size-number trade-offs and the variation of seed size with plant resource status. American Naturalist 140:287-304. Willis, A. J., J. Memmott, and R. I. Forrester. 2000. Is there evidence for the post-invasion evolution of vigour among invasive plant species? Ecology Letters 3:275-283. Wolfe, L. M. 1995. The genetics and ecology of seed size variation in a biennial plant, Hydrophyllum appendiculatum (Hydrphyllaceae). Oecologia 101:343-352. Wulff, R. D. 1986. Seed size variation in Desmodium paniculatum: I. Factors affecting seed size. Journal of Ecology 74:87-97.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Biological Sciences Publications
Ecology Centre Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 61 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 05 May 2005, 10:00:00 EST by Yvonne M Buckley on behalf of School of Biological Sciences