Reappraisal of disparities between osmolality estimates by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit methods

Winzor, D. J. (2004) Reappraisal of disparities between osmolality estimates by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit methods. Biophysical Chemistry, 107 3: 317-323. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2003.11.010


Author Winzor, D. J.
Title Reappraisal of disparities between osmolality estimates by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit methods
Journal name Biophysical Chemistry   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0301-4622
Publication date 2004-01-01
Sub-type Letter to editor, brief commentary or brief communication
DOI 10.1016/j.bpc.2003.11.010
Volume 107
Issue 3
Start page 317
End page 323
Total pages 7
Place of publication Amsterdam
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Subject C1
270101 Analytical Biochemistry
780105 Biological sciences
Abstract As a response to recent expression of concern about possible unreliability of vapor pressure deficit measurements K Kiyosawa, Biophys. Chem. 104 (2003) 171-188), the results of published studies on the temperature dependence of the osmotic pressure of aqueous polyethylene glycol solutions are shown to account for the observed discrepancies between osmolality estimates obtained by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit osmometry - the cause of the concern. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Biophysics
Chemistry, Physical
Freezing Point Depression
Polyethylene Glycol
Second Virial Coefficients
Vapor Pressure Deficit
Aqueous Polyethylene-glycol
Coefficients
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Letter to editor, brief commentary or brief communication
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
2005 Higher Education Research Data Collection
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 15 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 17 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 15 Aug 2007, 13:46:26 EST