Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss

Bennett, Joseph R., Maloney, Richard F., Sleeves, Tammy E., Brazill-Boast, James, Possingham, Hugh P. and Seddon, Philip J. (2017) Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1 4: 1-4. doi:10.1038/s41559-016-0053


Author Bennett, Joseph R.
Maloney, Richard F.
Sleeves, Tammy E.
Brazill-Boast, James
Possingham, Hugh P.
Seddon, Philip J.
Title Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss
Journal name Nature Ecology & Evolution   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 2397-334X
Publication date 2017-03-01
Year available 2017
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1038/s41559-016-0053
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 1
Issue 4
Start page 1
End page 4
Total pages 4
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
Language eng
Abstract There is contentious debate surrounding the merits of de-extinction as a biodiversity conservation tool. Here, we use extant analogues to predict conservation actions for potential de-extinction candidate species from New Zealand and the Australian state of New South Wales, and use a prioritization protocol to predict the impacts of reintroducing and maintaining populations of these species on conservation of extant threatened species. Ewen using the optimistic assumptions that resurrection of species is externally sponsored, and that actions for resurrected species can share costs with extant analogue species, public funding for conservation of resurrected species would lead to fewer extant species that could be conserved, suggesting net biodiversity loss. If full costs of establishment and maintenance for resurrected species populations were publicly funded, there could be substantial sacrifices in extant species conservation. If conservation of resurrected species populations could be fully externally sponsored, there could be benefits to extant threatened species. However, such benefits would be outweighed by opportunity costs, assuming such discretionary money could directly fund conservation of extant species. Potential sacrifices in conservation of extant species should be a crucial consideration in deciding whether to invest in de-extinction or focus our efforts on extant species.
Keyword Conservation
Prioritization
Allocation
Mismatch
Forever
Needs
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: HERDC Pre-Audit
School of Biological Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 8 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sat, 23 Dec 2017, 23:17:45 EST