Before the vote: UK foreign policy discourse on Syria 2011-2013

Ralph, Jason, Holland, Jack and Zhekova, Kalina (2017) Before the vote: UK foreign policy discourse on Syria 2011-2013. Review of International Studies, 1-23. doi:10.1017/S0260210517000134

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ509736_preprint_OA.pdf application/pdf 842.26KB 0

Author Ralph, Jason
Holland, Jack
Zhekova, Kalina
Title Before the vote: UK foreign policy discourse on Syria 2011-2013
Journal name Review of International Studies   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0260-2105
1469-9044
Publication date 2017-01-01
Year available 2017
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1017/S0260210517000134
Open Access Status Other
Start page 1
End page 23
Total pages 23
Place of publication Cambridge, United Kingdom
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Language eng
Abstract The literature of recent UK policy toward Syria focuses on the 2013 chemical weapons crisis. We examine policy discourses leading up to that. The government supported the removal of Assad but faced the challenge of explaining how that would be realized. Given its unwillingness and inability to mobilise support for military intervention, or to tailor policy goals to match available means, government strategy arguably lacked credibility. Our purpose is to examine how the government tried to close this ends means gap and how, having failed to do that, its ‘discursive strategy’ legitimised its approach. We argue the resources for the government’s discursive strategy on Syria can be found in the earlier articulation of ‘liberal conservatism’. A policy that from an ideal-liberal or ideal-conservative position might have been criticised as half-baked was maintained by a strategy that gave consideration to, but did not completely follow through on, either archetype. Drawing on an analysis of 2152 sources and supplemented by elite interviews, we illustrate how this strategy managed the interplay of two basic discourses: a liberal insistence that the UK should support ‘the Arab Spring’ and a conservative insistence that military intervention was imprudent because ‘Syria was not Libya’.
Keyword UK foreign policy
Syria
Discursive strategy
Intervention
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: HERDC Pre-Audit
School of Political Science and International Studies Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 14 Mar 2017, 11:09:16 EST by Susan Moule on behalf of School of Political Science & Internat'l Studies