How green is your garden?: urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits

Lin, B. B., Gaston, K. J., Fuller, R. A., Wu, D., Bush, R. and Shanahan, D. F. (2017) How green is your garden?: urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157 239-246. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.007


Author Lin, B. B.
Gaston, K. J.
Fuller, R. A.
Wu, D.
Bush, R.
Shanahan, D. F.
Title How green is your garden?: urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits
Journal name Landscape and Urban Planning   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0169-2046
1872-6062
Publication date 2017-01-01
Year available 2016
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.007
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 157
Start page 239
End page 246
Total pages 8
Place of publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier BV
Language eng
Subject 2303 Ecology
2309 Nature and Landscape Conservation
2308 Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Abstract Private yards provide city residents with access to ecosystem services that can be realized through passive (vegetation availability) and active (time spent in yards: frequency and duration) means. However, urban densification is leading to smaller yards with less vegetation. Here, we examine how urban form and socio-demographic factors affect the potential ecosystem service benefits people can gain via passive (e.g. climate regulation) and active (e.g. recreation) pathways. Two measures of vegetation cover (0.15–2 m, >2 m) are used as a proxy for passive ecosystem service benefits, and two measures of yard use (use frequency, total time spent across a week) are used for active ecosystem service benefits. We use survey and GIS data to measure personal and physical predictors that could influence these variables for 520 residents of detached housing in Brisbane, Australia. We found house age and yard size were positively correlated with vegetation cover, and people with a greater nature relatedness and lower socio-economic disadvantage also had greater vegetation cover. Yard size was an important predictor of yard use, as was nature relatedness, householder age, and presence of children in the home. Vegetation cover showed no relationship, indicating that greater cover alone does not promote ecosystem service delivery through the active use pathway. Together our results show that people who have higher nature relatedness may receive greater benefits from their yards via both passive and active means as they have more vegetation available to them in their yards and they interact with this space more frequently and for longer time periods.
Keyword Ecology
Environmental Studies
Geography
Geography, Physical
Urban Studies
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Geography
Physical Geography
Urban Studies
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Grant ID DP120102857
NE/J015237/1
Institutional Status UQ

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 16 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 11 Oct 2016, 10:25:46 EST by System User on behalf of Learning and Research Services (UQ Library)