A multi-center study: intra-scan and inter-scan variability of diffusion spectrum imaging

Lemkaddem, A., Daducci, A., Vulliemoz, S., O'Brien, K., Lazeyras, F., Hauf, M., Wiest, R., Meuli, R., Seeck, M., Krueger, G. and Thiran, J.-P. (2012) A multi-center study: intra-scan and inter-scan variability of diffusion spectrum imaging. NeuroImage, 62 1: 87-94. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.045

Author Lemkaddem, A.
Daducci, A.
Vulliemoz, S.
O'Brien, K.
Lazeyras, F.
Hauf, M.
Wiest, R.
Meuli, R.
Seeck, M.
Krueger, G.
Thiran, J.-P.
Title A multi-center study: intra-scan and inter-scan variability of diffusion spectrum imaging
Journal name NeuroImage   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1053-8119
Publication date 2012-08-01
Year available 2012
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.045
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 62
Issue 1
Start page 87
End page 94
Total pages 8
Place of publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate whether it is possible to pool together diffusion spectrum imaging data from four different scanners, located at three different sites. Two of the scanners had identical configuration whereas two did not. To measure the variability, we extracted three scalar maps (ADC, FA and GFA) from the DSI and utilized a region and a tract-based analysis. Additionally, a phantom study was performed to rule out some potential factors arising from the scanner performance in case some systematic bias occurred in the subject study. This work was split into three experiments: intra-scanner reproducibility, reproducibility with twin-scanner settings and reproducibility with other configurations. Overall for the intra-scanner and twin-scanner experiments, the region-based analysis coefficient of variation (CV) was in a range of 1%-4.2% and below 3% for almost every bundle for the tract-based analysis. The uncinate fasciculus showed the worst reproducibility, especially for FA and GFA values (CV 3.7-6%). For the GFA and FA maps, an ICC value of 0.7 and above is observed in almost all the regions/tracts. Looking at the last experiment, it was found that there is a very high similarity of the outcomes from the two scanners with identical setting. However, this was not the case for the two other imagers. Given the fact that the overall variation in our study is low for the imagers with identical settings, our findings support the feasibility of cross-site pooling of DSI data from identical scanners.
Keyword DSI
Multi-center study
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Grant ID 33CM30-124089
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: Centre for Advanced Imaging Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 11 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sat, 18 Jun 2016, 06:00:44 EST by System User on behalf of Centre for Advanced Imaging