Capacity and its fallacies: international state building as state transformation

Hameiri, Shahar (2009) Capacity and its fallacies: international state building as state transformation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38 1: 55-81. doi:10.1177/0305829809335942

Author Hameiri, Shahar
Title Capacity and its fallacies: international state building as state transformation
Journal name Millennium: Journal of International Studies   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0305-8298
Publication date 2009-08-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1177/0305829809335942
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 38
Issue 1
Start page 55
End page 81
Total pages 27
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher Sage Publications
Language eng
Abstract Considerable effort in recent years has gone into rebuilding fragile states. However, the debates over the effectiveness of such state-building exercises have tended to neglect that capacity building and the associated good governance programmes which comprise contemporary state building are essentially about transforming the state — meaning the ways in which political power is produced and reproduced. State capacity is now often presented as the missing link required for generating positive development outcomes and security. However, rather than being an objective and technical measure, capacity building constitutes a political and ideological mechanism for operationalising projects of state transnationalisation. The need to question prevailing notions of state capacity has become apparent in light of the failure of many state-building programmes. Such programmes have proven difficult to implement, and implementation has rarely achieved the expected development turnarounds or alleviation of violent conflict in those countries. In this article it is argued that, to identify the potential trajectories of such interventions, we must understand the role state building currently plays in domestic politics, and in particular, the ways in which processes of state transformation affect the development of different and often conflicting power bases within the state. This argument is examined using examples from the Australian-led Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands.
Keyword Fragile states
State building
State capacity
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Political Science and International Studies Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 20 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 23 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 25 Feb 2016, 19:34:00 EST by Bronwyn Clare Crook on behalf of School of Political Science & Internat'l Studies