Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: insights from practitioners to go beyond the 'usual suspects'

Colvin, R. M., Witt, G. Bradd and Lacey, Justine (2016) Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: insights from practitioners to go beyond the 'usual suspects'. Land Use Policy, 52 266-276. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032


Author Colvin, R. M.
Witt, G. Bradd
Lacey, Justine
Title Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: insights from practitioners to go beyond the 'usual suspects'
Journal name Land Use Policy   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0264-8377
1873-5754
Publication date 2016-03-01
Year available 2016
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 52
Start page 266
End page 276
Total pages 11
Place of publication Kidlington, Oxford United Kingdom
Publisher Pergamon Press
Language eng
Abstract Stakeholder analysis and engagement processes are recognised as essential in environmental and natural resources management (ENRM). Underpinning these processes is the identification of stakeholders, an often tacit process which finds the practitioner responsible for stakeholder analysis or engagement sifting through all of society to determine who is awarded stakeholder status for the given project or issue. While the ENRM literature provides guidance for stakeholder analysis and engagement, there has not been the same level of examination of the practical approaches to—and assumptions underlying—stakeholder identification by practitioners working in the field. This research extends on the ENRM stakeholder analysis and engagement literature by exploring the approaches to identification as used by ENRM practitioners. Semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with ENRM practitioners, leading to the classification of eight approaches to stakeholder identification. These approaches are discussed as the ‘art’ and ‘science’ of stakeholder identification. Practitioners’ conceptualisations of the terms stakeholder, community, and the citizenry are discussed, and differences in understandings of these critical terms are outlined based on the broad domain of ENRM in which the practitioner is operating (land use change versus agricultural extension or community engagement). The social structures of relevance to stakeholder identification (individual, social constituency, group, organisation) are presented, and practitioners’ perspectives on the role of groups are discussed. Through explicating the approaches to identification of stakeholders, this research offers new perspectives on a significant element of ENRM. These insights provide greater clarity on the practices which shape stakeholder analysis and engagement in ENRM, and highlight the importance of acknowledging the privileged position of the practitioner in deciding who is awarded stakeholder status in a project or issue.
Keyword Natural resources management
Participation
Citizenry
Community
Stakeholder engagement
Stakeholder analysis
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management Publications
HERDC Pre-Audit
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 11 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 19 Jan 2016, 10:15:28 EST by System User on behalf of School of Geography, Planning & Env Management