Evaluation of a process of implementation of a gestational diabetes nutrition model of care into practice

Wilkinson, Shelley A., McCray, Sally, Beckmann, Michael and Mcintyre, H.David (2016) Evaluation of a process of implementation of a gestational diabetes nutrition model of care into practice. Nutrition and Dietetics, 73 4: 329-335. doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12233

Author Wilkinson, Shelley A.
McCray, Sally
Beckmann, Michael
Mcintyre, H.David
Title Evaluation of a process of implementation of a gestational diabetes nutrition model of care into practice
Journal name Nutrition and Dietetics   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1747-0080
Publication date 2016-09-01
Year available 2015
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/1747-0080.12233
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 73
Issue 4
Start page 329
End page 335
Total pages 7
Place of publication Richmond, Victoria, Australia
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Language eng
Subject 2916 Nutrition and Dietetics
Formatted abstract
Aim: Poorly controlled gestational diabetes mellitus can result in negative pregnancy and delivery outcomes. A reduced need for insulin was documented in the validation of American gestational diabetes Nutrition Practice Guidelines, which recommend at least three dietitian visits. No Australian gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition guidelines exist. This paper evaluates the implementation of a dietetic model of care based on the American guidelines in an Australian hospital.

The implementation plan consisted of a nine-month pre (usual care)/post (new model of care) design with a month for ‘integration’ across 2012–2013. Primary outcomes were uptake of the new dietetic model of care and requirement for pharmacotherapy.

Results: Both phases ran for seven months; integration required four months. Pre-intervention, only one woman received a review appointment. Significantly more women received best-practice care post-implementation (P = 0.02); of the 162 women seen, 50.6% received two review appointments. As a result of heavy clinical demand, only 31.5% of the women seen post-implementation received an individual dietitian assessment and education session, deviating from best practice. Clinically relevant changes were seen in medication requirements with a decrease in women requiring pharmacological treatment (31.1% (pre); 26.9% (post) ). The difference was more pronounced in women who received best-practice care (27.2% (no) vs 25.0% (yes) ).

Conclusions: This project successfully increased the proportion of women seen according to best practice. Service limitations impaired the delivery of optimal care. The present study illustrates the opportunities and challenges of conducting evidence-based implementation research in routine clinical care.
Keyword Evidence-practice gap
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Guidelines into practice
Implementation science
Medical nutrition therapy
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Mater Research Institute-UQ (MRI-UQ)
Official 2016 Collection
School of Medicine Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 29 Dec 2015, 13:27:45 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service