Clarissa's political theology and the alternative modernity of god, death, and writing

Jackson, Spencer (2015) Clarissa's political theology and the alternative modernity of god, death, and writing. Eighteenth Century, 56 3: 321-342. doi:10.1353/ecy.2015.0023

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Jackson, Spencer
Title Clarissa's political theology and the alternative modernity of god, death, and writing
Journal name Eighteenth Century   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1935-0201
Publication date 2015-09-01
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1353/ecy.2015.0023
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 56
Issue 3
Start page 321
End page 342
Total pages 22
Place of publication Philadelphia, PA, United States
Publisher University of Pennsylvania Press
Language eng
Abstract The following essay begins with the contention that the prolonged conclusion of Richardson’s Clarissa (1747-8) has yet to be understood. From Brian Downs, to Vivasvan Soni, to Richardson himself, critics have long overlooked the significance of Clarissa’s monastic final weeks because they have interpreted them according to a false dichotomy between divine transcendence and mortal particularity. Refusing this opposition, I frame Clarissa’s final days in the worldly terms of political theology and hail the protracted end of Richardson’s novel as the period in which he simultaneously perfects and undoes the novel tradition. Drawing from Martin Luther’s A Treatise on Christian Liberty (1520) as well as Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905), I read Clarissa as a lesson in the overlooked potential for mainstream Protestantism to make modern novelistic subjects that stand against, and not merely for, the rising spirit of capitalism. While indebted to the critiques of secularism articulated by theorists such as Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Derrida, I argue that Clarissa takes the conversation a step further. By opposing “the light of [her] own judgment” against the authority of her male attackers, Clarissa not only articulates the theological foundation of her novelistic self, but also dramatizes the separatist politics that it makes possible. Building upon Nancy Armstrong and Leonard Tennenhouse’s model of the domestic novel as captivity tale, I celebrate Clarissa as the captive heroine who brings her morally exemplary and supremely discursive self to its extreme limit of perfection.
Keyword Captivity tale
Political theology
Samuel Richardson
Martin Heidegger
Martin Luther
Max Weber
Consumer society
Victoria Kahn
Ernst Kantorowicz
Sandra Macpherson
Strict liability
Nancy Armstrong
Leonard Tennenhouse
The novel
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences - Publications
Official 2016 Collection
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 22 Sep 2015, 15:23:02 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service