Intertidal diatom communities reflect patchiness in groundwater discharge

Welti, N., Gale, D., Hayes, M., Kumar, A., Gasparon, M., Gibbes, B. and Lockington, D. (2015) Intertidal diatom communities reflect patchiness in groundwater discharge. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 163 PB: 116-124. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2015.06.006

Author Welti, N.
Gale, D.
Hayes, M.
Kumar, A.
Gasparon, M.
Gibbes, B.
Lockington, D.
Title Intertidal diatom communities reflect patchiness in groundwater discharge
Journal name Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0272-7714
Publication date 2015-09-20
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.06.006
Volume 163
Issue PB
Start page 116
End page 124
Total pages 9
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher Academic Press
Language eng
Formatted abstract
We report on two discrete intertidal springs which discharge freshwater into Moreton Bay, Australia. Results from a seven month field survey which monitored chemical and hydraulic parameters, indicate fresh groundwater is continuously discharged from these features. Porewater measured from both groundwater springs (GWS) had consistently low salinity (0.07 ± 0.04 psu), pH (5) and high oxidation reduction potential (ORP; 194 mV) relative to the adjacent intertidal area (27.8 ± 16.7 psu; 6.8 pH; −92.3 ± 123.2 mV). Positive ORP, which suggests high dissolved oxygen, combined with lower concentrations of ammonium (N–NH4+) and higher concentrations of nitrate (N–NO3) relative to the intertidal area, reveal that these sites transport and cycle nutrients differently than the surrounding beach. The C:N:P ratio from the GWS sites differs significantly (p < 0.05) from the rest of the intertidal zone, with lower C:N and higher N:P ratios measured from the GWS relative to the rest of the intertidal zone. The unique geochemical characteristics of the GWS sites appear to influence the abundance and species assemblage of the local phytoplankton community. Diatom assemblages from the two GWS were taxonomically distinct to the diatom assemblage of the surrounding intertidal zone. A total of 25 taxa were identified within the entire field area. Of these, four were unique to freshwater habitats and found only at the GWS. Based on the differences in nutrient and geochemical composition between the GWS sites and the adjacent intertidal porewater, two scenarios explaining the source of the GWS are further hypothesized. This study emphasizes the importance of considering small-scale heterogeneous submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) for local nutrient budgets and subsequent impacts on local biota.
Keyword Submarine groundwater discharge
Nutrient cycles
Intertidal environment
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 28 Jul 2015, 10:13:55 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service