Lymphedema after breast or gynecological cancer: use and effectiveness of mainstream and complementary therapies.

Finnane, Anna, Liu, Yuan, Battistutta, Diana, Janda, Monika and Hayes, Sandra C. (2011) Lymphedema after breast or gynecological cancer: use and effectiveness of mainstream and complementary therapies.. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 17 9: 867-869. doi:10.1089/acm.2010.0456


Author Finnane, Anna
Liu, Yuan
Battistutta, Diana
Janda, Monika
Hayes, Sandra C.
Title Lymphedema after breast or gynecological cancer: use and effectiveness of mainstream and complementary therapies.
Journal name Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1075-5535
1557-7708
Publication date 2011-01-01
Year available 2011
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1089/acm.2010.0456
Open Access Status
Volume 17
Issue 9
Start page 867
End page 869
Total pages 3
Place of publication New Rochelle, NY United States
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the use, as well as perceived effectiveness, of mainstream and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies in the treatment of lymphedema following breast or gynecological cancer. Further, the study assessed the relationship between the characteristics of lymphedema (including type, severity, stability, and duration), and the use of CAM and/or mainstream treatment.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of women with lymphedema following breast and gynecological cancers. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 247 potentially eligible women. Of those returned (50%), 23 were ineligible and 6 were excluded due to level of missing data.

Results: In the previous 12 months, the majority of women (90%) had used mainstream treatments to treat their lymphedema, with massage being the most commonly used (86%). One (1) in 2 women had used CAM to treat their lymphedema, and 98% of those using CAM were also using mainstream treatments. Over 27 types of CAM were reported, with use of a chi machine, vitamin E supplements, yoga, and meditation being the most commonly reported forms. The perceived effectiveness ratings (1–7 with 7=completely effective) of mainstream (mean±standard deviation (SD): 5.3±1.5) and CAM therapies (mean±SD: 5.2+1.6) were considered high.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that mainstream and CAM treatment use is common, varied, and considered to be effective among women with lymphedema following breast or gynecological cancer. Furthermore, it highlights the immediate need for larger prospective studies assessing the inter-relationship between the use of mainstream and CAM therapies for treatment success.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: Centre for Online Health Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 17 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 12 Jun 2015, 23:22:12 EST by Anna Finnane on behalf of Centre for On-Line Health