Designing environmental research for impact

Campbell, C. A., Lefroy, E. C., Caddy-Retalic, S., Bax, N., Doherty, P. J., Douglas, M. M., Johnson, D., Possingham, H. P., Specht, A., Tarte, D. and West, J. (2015) Designing environmental research for impact. Science of the Total Environment, 534 4-13. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.089


Author Campbell, C. A.
Lefroy, E. C.
Caddy-Retalic, S.
Bax, N.
Doherty, P. J.
Douglas, M. M.
Johnson, D.
Possingham, H. P.
Specht, A.
Tarte, D.
West, J.
Title Designing environmental research for impact
Journal name Science of the Total Environment   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0048-9697
1879-1026
Publication date 2015-11-15
Year available 2015
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.089
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 534
Start page 4
End page 13
Total pages 10
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Transdisciplinary research, involving close collaboration between researchers and the users of research, has been a feature of environmental problem solving for several decades, often spurred by the need to find negotiated outcomes to intractable problems. In 2005, the Australian government allocated funding to its environment portfolio for public good research, which resulted in consecutive four-year programmes (Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities, National Environmental Research Program). In April 2014, representatives of the funders, researchers and research users associated with these programmes met to reflect on eight years of experience with these collaborative research models.

This structured reflection concluded that successful multi-institutional transdisciplinary research is necessarily a joint enterprise between funding agencies, researchers and the end users of research. The design and governance of research programmes need to explicitly recognise shared accountabilities among the participants, while respecting the different perspectives of each group. Experience shows that traditional incentive systems for academic researchers, current trends in public sector management, and loose organisation of many end users, work against sustained transdisciplinary research on intractable problems, which require continuity and adaptive learning by all three parties. The likelihood of research influencing and improving environmental policy and management is maximised when researchers, funders and research users have shared goals; there is sufficient continuity of personnel to build trust and sustain dialogue throughout the research process from issue scoping to application of findings; and there is sufficient flexibility in the funding, structure and operation of transdisciplinary research initiatives to enable the enterprise to assimilate and respond to new knowledge and situations.
Keyword Collaborative
Flexible
Knowledge brokering
Knowledge management
Multi-institutional
Participatory
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 11 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 20 Jan 2015, 10:55:35 EST by System User on behalf of School of Biological Sciences