Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps

Mitchell, Matthew G. E., Bennett, Elena M. and Gonzalez, Andrew (2013) Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems, 16 5: 894-908. doi:10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2


Author Mitchell, Matthew G. E.
Bennett, Elena M.
Gonzalez, Andrew
Title Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps
Journal name Ecosystems   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1432-9840
1435-0629
Publication date 2013-08-01
Year available 2013
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 16
Issue 5
Start page 894
End page 908
Total pages 15
Place of publication New York, United States
Publisher Springer
Language eng
Abstract Human activities are rapidly changing ecosystems, landscapes and ecosystem service provision, yet there remain significant gaps in our understanding of the spatial ecology of ecosystem services. These gaps hinder our ability to manage landscapes effectively for multiple ecosystem services. In particular, we do not fully understand how changes in landscape connectivity affect ecosystem service provision, despite theory suggesting that connectivity is important. Here, we perform a semi-quantitative review of the literature that investigates how landscape connectivity affects the provision of specific ecosystem services. The vast majority of studies, including reviews, models, and field studies, suggest that decreased connectivity will have negative effects on ecosystem service provision. However, only 15 studies provided empirical evidence of these effects. Average effect sizes from these 15 studies suggest negative effects of connectivity loss on pollination and pest regulation. We identify a number of significant gaps in the connectivity-ecosystem services literature, including: a lack of multiple service studies, which precludes identification of trade-offs between services as connectivity changes; few studies that directly measure organism movement and its effects on ecosystem services; and few empirical studies that investigate the importance of abiotic flows on service provision. We propose that future research should aim to understand how different aspects of connectivity affect ecosystem service provision; which services are most influenced by connectivity; and how connectivity influences how humans access and benefit from ecosystem services. Studies that answer these questions will advance our understanding of connectivity-ecosystem service provision relationships and allow for better ecosystem and landscape management and restoration.
Keyword Biodiversity
Connectivity
Dispersal
Ecosystem management
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collection: School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 91 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 101 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sat, 06 Sep 2014, 02:17:22 EST by Matthew Mitchell on behalf of School of Geography, Planning & Env Management