Secularization: the birth of a modern combat concept

Hunter, Ian (2014) Secularization: the birth of a modern combat concept. Modern Intellectual History, 12 1: 1-32. doi:10.1017/S1479244314000158

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Hunter, Ian
Title Secularization: the birth of a modern combat concept
Journal name Modern Intellectual History   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1479-2443
Publication date 2014-08-04
Year available 2014
Sub-type Fully published paper
DOI 10.1017/S1479244314000158
Volume 12
Issue 1
Start page 1
End page 32
Total pages 32
Place of publication Cambridge, UK
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Language eng
Abstract This essay argues that today's dominant understanding of secularization—as an epochal transition from a society based on religious belief to one based on autonomous human reason—first appeared in philosophical histories at the beginning of the nineteenth century and was then anachronistically applied to early modern Europe. Apart from the earlier and persisting canon-law use of the term to refer to a species of exclaustration, prior to 1800 the standard lexicographical meaning of “secularization” was determined by its use in public law and diplomacy to name the civil conversion of ecclesiastical property and jurisdiction. Prior to the same point the most important use of the adjective “secular” was in political jurisprudence as a synonym for temporal, civil, and political, to name a religious–political settlement from which rival theologies had been excluded as the condition of its negotiation. But this usage was domain-specific, was quite compatible with religious devotion, and had nothing to do with the putatively secular character of the spheres of philosophy or the natural sciences, thence “society”. Far from seeing a shift from religious belief to autonomous rationality, early modernity in fact witnessed a significant intensification of religious belief and practice under the impact of rival confessional movements. It also emerges that the nineteenth century was characterized not by the supersession of confessional religions—or their conversion into rational religion or moral philosophy—but by their remarkable persistence and adaptation to new circumstances. In light of this, the essay argues that the variant philosophical-historical conceptions of secularization—as the epochal supersession of religious belief by human rationality—should not be understood as theories of a putative process but as “combat concepts”. These were internal to an array of rival cultural-political factions that first emerged in early nineteenth-century Protestant Germany and that continue to do battle today.
Keyword Secularisation
Public law
Religious pluralism
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Fully published paper
Collections: Official 2015 Collection
Centre for the History of European Discourses Publications
Available Versions of this Record
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 3 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 26 Aug 2014, 03:14:57 EST by Mary-Anne Marrington on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service