Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

Hoffmann, Tammy C., Legare, France, Simmons, Magenta B., McNamara, Kevin, McCaffery, Kirsten, Trevena, Lyndal J., Hudson, Ben, Glasziou, Paul P. and Del Mar, Christopher B. (2014) Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?. Medical Journal of Australia, 201 1: 35-39. doi:10.5694/mja14.00002


Author Hoffmann, Tammy C.
Legare, France
Simmons, Magenta B.
McNamara, Kevin
McCaffery, Kirsten
Trevena, Lyndal J.
Hudson, Ben
Glasziou, Paul P.
Del Mar, Christopher B.
Title Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?
Journal name Medical Journal of Australia   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1326-5377
0025-729X
Publication date 2014-07-07
Year available 2014
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.5694/mja14.00002
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 201
Issue 1
Start page 35
End page 39
Total pages 5
Place of publication Strawberry Hills, NSW, Australia
Publisher Australasian Medical Publishing
Collection year 2015
Language eng
Abstract Shared decision making enables a clinician and patient to participate jointly in making a health decision, having discussed the options and their benefits and harms, and having considered the patient's values, preferences and circumstances. It is not a single step to be added into a consultation, but a process that can be used to guide decisions about screening, investigations and treatments. The benefits of shared decision making include enabling evidence and patients' preferences to be incorporated into a consultation; improving patient knowledge, risk perception accuracy and patient-clinician communication; and reducing decisional conflict, feeling uninformed and inappropriate use of tests and treatments. Various approaches can be used to guide clinicians through the process. We elaborate on five simple questions that can be used: What will happen if the patient waits and watches? What are the test or treatment options? What are the benefits and harms of each option? How do the benefits and harms weigh up for the patient? Does the patient have enough information to make a choice? Although shared decision making can occur without tools, various types of decision support tools now exist to facilitate it. Misconceptions about shared decision making are hampering its implementation. We address the barriers, as perceived by clinicians. Despite numerous international initiatives to advance shared decision making, very little has occurred in Australia. Consequently, we are lagging behind many other countries and should act urgently.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2015 Collection
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 41 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 38 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 05 Aug 2014, 10:24:52 EST by System User on behalf of School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences