Do community supported fisheries (CSFs) improve sustainability?

McClenachan, Loren, Neal, Benjamin P., Al-Abdulrazzak, Dalal, Witkin, Taylor, Fisher, Kara and Kittinger, John N. (2014) Do community supported fisheries (CSFs) improve sustainability?. Fisheries Research, 157 62-69. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.03.016


Author McClenachan, Loren
Neal, Benjamin P.
Al-Abdulrazzak, Dalal
Witkin, Taylor
Fisher, Kara
Kittinger, John N.
Title Do community supported fisheries (CSFs) improve sustainability?
Journal name Fisheries Research   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0165-7836
1872-6763
Publication date 2014-09-01
Year available 2014
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.03.016
Volume 157
Start page 62
End page 69
Total pages 8
Place of publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Community supported fisheries (CSFs) have emerged recently and expanded rapidly in the United States and Canada as an analog to community supported agriculture, and have been proposed as a way to reduce the environmental impacts associated with seafood production, distribution, and consumption. Here, we test the hypothesis that CSFs are more sustainable than industrial fisheries by comparing these systems across a range of sustainability metrics: carbon footprint, sustainability of target stocks, and associated environmental impacts. We find that consuming seafood distributed by local CSFs reduces the average seafood carbon footprint by more than two orders of magnitude; the mean distribution distance for CSF products was 65 km, compared to an average distance of 8812 km for industrially supplied seafood consumed in the United States. There was no difference in the sustainability of target species as measured by mean trophic level, sustainability rating, or current stock biomass status (B/BMSY). However, CSFs do distribute a subset of highly abundant stocks not targeted by industrialized fisheries, which has a strong potential to increase local fisheries sustainability. Finally, we delineate five ways in which CSFs may reduce environmental impacts associated with fisheries and identify current examples of these practices, including marketing species that would otherwise be discarded and encouraging fishers to experiment with lower impact fishing gear. Challenges remain to the widespread use of CSFs, but increased attention to local food systems should result in environmental benefits for fisheries and marine ecosystems.
Keyword Carbon footprint
Community fisheries
Conservation
Local food systems
Under-utilized stocks
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Global Change Institute Publications
Official 2015 Collection
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 12 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 20 May 2014, 12:27:39 EST by System User on behalf of Global Change Institute