Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints

Thompson, Matthew B., Tangen, Jason M. and McCarthy, Duncan J. (2014) Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints. Law and Human Behavior, 38 1: 84-93. doi:10.1037/lhb0000051


Author Thompson, Matthew B.
Tangen, Jason M.
McCarthy, Duncan J.
Title Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints
Journal name Law and Human Behavior   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0147-7307
1573-661X
Publication date 2014-01-01
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1037/lhb0000051
Volume 38
Issue 1
Start page 84
End page 93
Total pages 10
Place of publication New York, NY, United States
Publisher Springer
Language eng
Abstract There has been very little research into the nature and development of fingerprint matching expertise. Here we present the results of an experiment testing the claimed matching expertise of fingerprint examiners. Expert (n = 37), intermediate trainee (n = 8), new trainee (n = 9), and novice (n = 37) participants performed a fingerprint discrimination task involving genuine crime scene latent fingerprints, their matches, and highly similar distractors, in a signal detection paradigm. Results show that qualified, court-practicing fingerprint experts were exceedingly accurate compared with novices. Experts showed a conservative response bias, tending to err on the side of caution by making more errors of the sort that could allow a guilty person to escape detection than errors of the sort that could falsely incriminate an innocent person. The superior performance of experts was not simply a function of their ability to match prints, per se, but a result of their ability to identify the highly similar, but nonmatching fingerprints as such. Comparing these results with previous experiments, experts were even more conservative in their decision making when dealing with these genuine crime scene prints than when dealing with simulated crime scene prints, and this conservatism made them relatively less accurate overall. Intermediate trainees-despite their lack of qualification and average 3.5 years experience-performed about as accurately as qualified experts who had an average 17.5 years experience. New trainees-despite their 5-week, full-time training course or their 6 months experience-were not any better than novices at discriminating matching and similar nonmatching prints, they were just more conservative. Further research is required to determine the precise nature of fingerprint matching expertise and the factors that influence performance. The findings of this representative, lab-based experiment may have implications for the way fingerprint examiners testify in court, but what the findings mean for reasoning about expert performance in the wild is an open, empirical, and epistemological question.
Keyword Decision making
Expertise
Fingerprints
Law
Testimony
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2014 Collection
School of Psychology Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 04 Mar 2014, 10:53:39 EST by System User on behalf of School of Psychology