Sensitivity of direct canopy gap fraction retrieval from airborne waveform lidar to topography and survey characteristics

Chen, X. T., Disney, M. I., Lewis, P., Armston, J., Han, J. T. and Li, J. C. (2014) Sensitivity of direct canopy gap fraction retrieval from airborne waveform lidar to topography and survey characteristics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 143 15-25. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.010


Author Chen, X. T.
Disney, M. I.
Lewis, P.
Armston, J.
Han, J. T.
Li, J. C.
Title Sensitivity of direct canopy gap fraction retrieval from airborne waveform lidar to topography and survey characteristics
Journal name Remote Sensing of Environment   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0034-4257
1879-0704
Publication date 2014-03-05
Year available 2014
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.010
Open Access Status
Volume 143
Start page 15
End page 25
Total pages 11
Place of publication New York, United States
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Subject 1111 Soil Science
1907 Geology
1903 Computers in Earth Sciences
Abstract Recently, Armston et al. (2013) have demonstrated that a new, physically-based method for direct retrieval of canopy gap probability P from waveform lidar can improve the estimation of P over discrete return lidar data. The success of the approach was demonstrated in a savanna woodland environment in Australia. The huge advantage of this method is that it uses the data themselves to solve for the canopy contrast term i.e. the ratio of the reflectance from crown and ground, ρ/ρ. In this way the method avoids local calibration that is typically required to overcome differences in either ρ or ρ. To be more generally useful the method must be demonstrated on different sites and in the presence of slope and different sensor and survey configurations. If it is robust to these things, slope in particular, then we would suggest it is likely to be widely useful. Here, we test the robustness of the retrieval of P from waveform lidar using the Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research dataset, over the Heihe River Basin region of China. The data contain significant canopy, terrain and survey variations, presenting a rather different set of conditions to those previously used. Results show that ρ/ρ is seen to be stable across all flights and for all levels of spatial aggregation. This strongly supports the robustness of the new P retrieval method, which assumes that this relationship is stable. A comparison between P estimated from hemiphotos and from the waveform lidar showed agreement with Pearson correlation coefficient R=0.91. The waveform lidar-derived estimates of P agreed to within 8% of values derived from hemiphotos, with a bias of 0.17%. The new waveform model was shown to be stable across different off-nadir scan angles and in the presence of slopes up to 26° with R≥0.85 in all cases. We also show that the waveform model can be used to calculate P using just the mean value of canopy returns, assuming that their distribution is unimodal. Lastly, we show that the method can also be applied to discrete return lidar data, albeit with slightly lower accuracy and higher bias, allowing P comparisons with previously-collected lidar datasets. Our results show the new method should be applicable for estimating P robustly across large areas, and from lidar data collected at different times and using different systems; an increasingly important requirement.
Formatted abstract
Recently, Armston et al. (2013) have demonstrated that a new, physically-based method for direct retrieval of canopy gap probability Pgap from waveform lidar can improve the estimation of Pgap over discrete return lidar data. The success of the approach was demonstrated in a savanna woodland environment in Australia. The huge advantage of this method is that it uses the data themselves to solve for the canopy contrast term i.e. the ratio of the reflectance from crown and ground, ρvg. In this way the method avoids local calibration that is typically required to overcome differences in either ρv or ρg. To be more generally useful the method must be demonstrated on different sites and in the presence of slope and different sensor and survey configurations. If it is robust to these things, slope in particular, then we would suggest it is likely to be widely useful. Here, we test the robustness of the retrieval of Pgap from waveform lidar using the Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research dataset, over the Heihe River Basin region of China. The data contain significant canopy, terrain and survey variations, presenting a rather different set of conditions to those previously used. Results show that ρvg is seen to be stable across all flights and for all levels of spatial aggregation. This strongly supports the robustness of the new Pgap retrieval method, which assumes that this relationship is stable. A comparison between Pgap estimated from hemiphotos and from the waveform lidar showed agreement with Pearson correlation coefficient R=0.91. The waveform lidar-derived estimates of Pgap agreed to within 8% of values derived from hemiphotos, with a bias of 0.17%. The new waveform model was shown to be stable across different off-nadir scan angles and in the presence of slopes up to 26° with R≥0.85 in all cases. We also show that the waveform model can be used to calculate Pgap using just the mean value of canopy returns, assuming that their distribution is unimodal. Lastly, we show that the method can also be applied to discrete return lidar data, albeit with slightly lower accuracy and higher bias, allowing Pgap comparisons with previously-collected lidar datasets. Our results show the new method should be applicable for estimating Pgap robustly across large areas, and from lidar data collected at different times and using different systems; an increasingly important requirement.
Keyword Waveform lidar
Canopy
Gap fraction
Airborne
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management Publications
Official 2015 Collection
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 18 Feb 2014, 10:14:53 EST by System User on behalf of School of Geography, Planning & Env Management