An investigation of triple system estimators in censuses

Baffour, Benard, Brown, James J. and Smith, Peter W. F. (2013) An investigation of triple system estimators in censuses. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 29 1: 53-68. doi:10.3233/SJI-130760

Author Baffour, Benard
Brown, James J.
Smith, Peter W. F.
Title An investigation of triple system estimators in censuses
Journal name Statistical Journal of the IAOS   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1874-7655
Publication date 2013-01-01
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.3233/SJI-130760
Volume 29
Issue 1
Start page 53
End page 68
Total pages 16
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publisher I O S Press
Language eng
Subject 1404 Management Information Systems
1804 Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
2002 Cultural Studies
Formatted abstract
The value of a census cannot be overstated, given that no other data resource provides such detailed information about the population. Further, censuses are often the only historical data source to map out change over time due the consistency of questions asked. However, it is often the most expensive undertaking – other than going to war – that a country embarks on. Countries are thus seeking more cost-effective alternatives. This paper details some exploratory research into one such alternative, based on capture-recapture methods. Capture recapture methods have been used for population estimation for decades, but the focus has been on dual system estimation.

Dual system measurement of the population has been criticized for its reliance on the independence assumption between the two systems. This assumption is untestable, and failure introduces bias into the estimates of the population. The most logical improvement of dual system estimation is triple system estimation. In this paper, a simulation study is carried out to compare the performance of different dual and triple system estimators of the population size under various dependency scenarios. Performance is explored through both the bias and variability. The study shows that the dual system estimator copes well with dependence, provided the coverage of both lists are reasonably high. In addition, although the triple system estimators yield less biased estimates of the population, the dual system estimator is shown to be robust enough to cope with low levels of dependence 
Keyword Capture Recapture Data
Census estimation
Non Response
Population coverage
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Institute for Social Science Research - Publications
Official 2014 Collection
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 29 Nov 2013, 05:56:56 EST by System User on behalf of Institute for Social Science Research