The contribution of social norms to the Global Financial Crisis: a systemic actor focused model and proposal for regulatory change

Nicholson, Gavin, Kiel, Geoffrey and Kiel-Chisholm, Scott (2011) The contribution of social norms to the Global Financial Crisis: a systemic actor focused model and proposal for regulatory change. Corporate Governance, 19 5: 471-488. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00883.x


Author Nicholson, Gavin
Kiel, Geoffrey
Kiel-Chisholm, Scott
Title The contribution of social norms to the Global Financial Crisis: a systemic actor focused model and proposal for regulatory change
Journal name Corporate Governance   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0964-8410
1467-8683
Publication date 2011-09-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00883.x
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 19
Issue 5
Start page 471
End page 488
Total pages 18
Place of publication Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Formatted abstract
Manuscript Type: Conceptual
Research Question/Issue: Conventional regulatory reforms of the financial system focus on standard economic assumptions of self-interested, rational actors. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and similar financial failures highlight that there are limits to this approach. Instead we use a norm-based (or soft law) perspective to examine how the systemic problems underlying the GFC lay not so much in neo-classical economic assumptions of self-interest, but in unchecked financial innovation exploited by norms of buyer beware and ratings agency reliance among market participants. Fueled by sector-wide remuneration practices, these norms created information asymmetries that fundamentally undermined the integrity of the market.
Research Findings/Insights: We present a model that highlights how investment banks, as professional service firms, have superior information to their clients. This presents an information asymmetry problem whereby they can exploit the market norm of caveat emptor (buyer beware) when developing innovative financial transactions. We propose a model highlighting how flawed financial innovation can lead to widespread, systemic problems of assessing and pricing risk because market participants can actively develop and promote flawed transactions. This problem is exacerbated where there is an over-reliance on credit ratings agencies (due to the high information and search costs facing buyers) and a reduced emphasis on director fiduciary duties in financial Special Purpose Entities.
Theoretical/Academic Implications: Social norms that underpin financial markets are central to market regulation. Our approach provides a re-examination of the often unquestioned use of universal norms for differing market transactions in the financial sector. Researchers need to explore the interaction between social norms and market contexts (such as financial innovation) to better understand the behavior of financial markets. We contend that a mismatch between norms and market mechanisms can lead to significant unintended outcomes. Our approach of combining soft law (norms) and hard law (regulation) approaches to regulation provides added insights into agency, stewardship, and institutional theories.
Practitioner/Policy Implications: Regulators need to understand norms and financial market contexts to develop better legislative interventions. Specifically, differentiating between transaction types in financial markets will address the problems associated with information and search costs facing buyers of flawed financial innovation. We also provide proposals for policy makers seeking to embed accountability for risk taking across the key participants in the financial system to minimize market distortions in the majority of the financial sector.
Keyword Corporate governance
Governmental protection
Hard versus soft law
Legal effectiveness
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: UQ Business School Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 7 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 28 Nov 2013, 09:32:10 EST by System User on behalf of UQ Business School