A new instrument to assess physician skill at thoracic ultrasound, including pleural effusion markup

Salamonsen, Matthew, McGrath, David, Steiler, Geoff, Ware, Robert, Colt, Henri and Fielding, David (2013) A new instrument to assess physician skill at thoracic ultrasound, including pleural effusion markup. Chest, 144 3: 930-934. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2728

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Salamonsen, Matthew
McGrath, David
Steiler, Geoff
Ware, Robert
Colt, Henri
Fielding, David
Title A new instrument to assess physician skill at thoracic ultrasound, including pleural effusion markup
Journal name Chest   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0012-3692
Publication date 2013-09-01
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1378/chest.12-2728
Open Access Status
Volume 144
Issue 3
Start page 930
End page 934
Total pages 5
Place of publication Northbrook, IL United States
Publisher American College of Chest Physicians
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background: To reduce complications and increase success, thoracic ultrasound is recommended to guide all chest drainage procedures. Despite this, no tools currently exist to assess proceduralist training or competence. This study aims to validate an instrument to assess physician skill at performing thoracic ultrasound, including effusion markup, and examine its validity.

Methods: We developed an 11-domain, 100-point assessment sheet in line with British Thoracic Society guidelines: the Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis Skills and Tasks Assessment Test (UGSTAT). The test was used to assess 22 participants (eight novices, seven intermediates, seven advanced) on two occasions while performing thoracic ultrasound on a pleural effusion phantom. Each test was scored by two blinded expert examiners. Validity was examined by assessing the ability of the test to stratify participants according to expected skill level (analysis of variance) and demonstrating test-retest and intertester reproducibility by comparison of repeated scores (mean difference [95% CI] and paired t test) and the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Mean scores for the novice, intermediate, and advanced groups were 49.3, 73.0, and 91.5 respectively, which were all significantly different (P < .0001). There were no significant differences between repeated scores.

Conclusions: Procedural training on mannequins prior to unsupervised performance on patients is rapidly becoming the standard in medical education. This study has validated the UGSTAT, which can now be used to determine the adequacy of thoracic ultrasound training prior to clinical practice. It is likely that its role could be extended to live patients, providing a way to document ongoing
Keyword Assessment-Tool
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2014 Collection
School of Public Health Publications
School of Medicine Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 11 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 24 Nov 2013, 10:06:59 EST by System User on behalf of School of Public Health