Overweight and obesity in pregnancy: the evidence-practice gap in staff knowledge, attitudes and practices

Wilkinson, Shelley A. and Stapleton, Helen (2012) Overweight and obesity in pregnancy: the evidence-practice gap in staff knowledge, attitudes and practices. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 52 6: 588-592. doi:10.1111/ajo.12011


Author Wilkinson, Shelley A.
Stapleton, Helen
Title Overweight and obesity in pregnancy: the evidence-practice gap in staff knowledge, attitudes and practices
Journal name Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0004-8666
1479-828X
Publication date 2012-12-01
Year available 2012
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/ajo.12011
Open Access Status
Volume 52
Issue 6
Start page 588
End page 592
Total pages 5
Place of publication Richmond, VIC, Australia
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Language eng
Abstract Background: Statewide (Queensland) Clinical Guidelines reflecting current best practice have recently become available for the management of pregnancy-related obesity. However, dissemination of guidelines alone do not change practice.
Formatted abstract
Background: Statewide (Queensland) Clinical Guidelines reflecting current best practice have recently become available for the management of pregnancy-related obesity. However, dissemination of guidelines alone do not change practice.

Aim: To systematically assess evidence–practice gap in the multidisciplinary management of overweight and obesity (ow/ob) in pregnancy to inform an intervention to facilitate translating obesity guidelines into practice in a tertiary maternity service.

Materials and Methods: An online survey, available over a three-week period (May–June 2011), was disseminated to obstetric, midwifery and allied health staff. Outcomes of interest included a 15-point guideline adherence score, knowledge of guideline content, advice given, knowledge of obesity–pregnancy-related complications, previous training and referral patterns.

Results: Eighty-four staff completed surveys (57% response rate). Widespread discordance with the guideline was noted. The majority (88.1%) reported overweight/obesity (ow/ob) as an important/very important general obstetric issue, most correctly identified associated complications. However, only 32.1% were aware of existing guidelines, with only half correctly identifying BMI categories for ow/ob. Compliance with referral recommendations varied; 20% of staff considered referral ‘was not their job’.

Conclusions: Staff are aware of negative outcomes associated with maternal ow/ob, although few are fully compliant with referral guidelines or provide advice in line with recommendations. These findings will be categorised using implementation of science methodological frameworks, and effective behaviour change interventions will be constructed to facilitate translation of this important guideline into practice.

Keyword Evidence-practice gap
Guidelines
Implementation
Obesity
Overweight
Ppregnancy
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Pharmacy Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 22 Nov 2013, 20:45:05 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service