Personality, cognition and hazardous drinking: support for the 2-Component Approach to Reinforcing Substances Model

Harnett, Paul H, Lynch, Samantha J., Gullo, MatthewJ., Dawe, Sharon and Loxton, Natalie (2013) Personality, cognition and hazardous drinking: support for the 2-Component Approach to Reinforcing Substances Model. Addictive Behaviors, 38 12: 2945-2948. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.017

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Harnett2013_post_print.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 307.82KB 0

Author Harnett, Paul H
Lynch, Samantha J.
Gullo, MatthewJ.
Dawe, Sharon
Loxton, Natalie
Title Personality, cognition and hazardous drinking: support for the 2-Component Approach to Reinforcing Substances Model
Journal name Addictive Behaviors   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0306-4603
1873-6327
Publication date 2013-12-01
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.017
Open Access Status File (Author Post-print)
Volume 38
Issue 12
Start page 2945
End page 2948
Total pages 4
Place of publication Kidlington, Oxford, United Kingdom
Publisher Pergamon
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Highlights
• We replicated a structural model of hazardous alcohol use.
• We examined the relationship between personality and cognition.
• Reward drive increased positive expectancies regarding the effects of alcohol.
• Rash impulsivity weakened ability to refuse alcohol.
• Impulsivity increases understanding of cognitive processes in alcohol use.

Personality and cognitive processes are both related to alcohol use and misuse. A recent model of hazardous drinking referred, the 2-CARS model, postulates two major pathways to hazardous drinking. One pathway primarily involves the association between Reward Drive and Positive Outcome Expectancies, the second involves the association between Rash Impulsiveness and Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy. In previous tests of the model, Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy was found to have the most proximal impact on drinking, being directly influenced by Rash Impulsiveness, and indirectly influenced by Reward Drive through Positive Outcome Expectancies. The aim of the current study was to test the 2-CARS model in a larger independent sample. Results found that individuals with a strong Reward Drive showed higher Positive Outcome Expectancies, while individuals high in Rash Impulsiveness were more likely to report reduced Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy. The present results also showed a theoretically unexpected pathway with a direct association between Rash Impulsiveness and Positive Outcome Expectancies. However, overall the results support the view that a greater understanding of hazardous drinking can be achieved by investigating the relationship between these personality and cognitive variables.
Keyword Reward drive
Rash impulsivity
Alcohol expectancy
Drinking refusal self-efficacy
Alcohol
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Grant ID APP1036365
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences -- Publications
Official 2014 Collection
School of Psychology Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 7 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 15 Nov 2013, 18:43:50 EST by Paul Harnett on behalf of School of Psychology