As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes

Allen, Benjamin L., Fleming, Peter J. S., Allen, Lee R., Engeman, Richard M., Ballard, Guy and Leung, Luke K. -P. (2013) As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes. Biological Conservation, 159 158-174. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.004

Author Allen, Benjamin L.
Fleming, Peter J. S.
Allen, Lee R.
Engeman, Richard M.
Ballard, Guy
Leung, Luke K. -P.
Title As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes
Journal name Biological Conservation   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0006-3207
Publication date 2013-03-01
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.004
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 159
Start page 158
End page 174
Total pages 17
Place of publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Subject 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
2309 Nature and Landscape Conservation
Abstract Top-predators have been reported to have an important role in structuring food webs and maintaining ecological processes for the benefit of biodiversity at lower trophic levels. This is thought to be achieved through their suppressive effects on sympatric mesopredators and prey. Great scientific and public interest surrounds the potential use of top-predators as biodiversity conservation tools, and it can often be difficult to separate what we think we know and what we really know about their ecological utility. Not all the claims made about the ecological roles of top-predators can be substantiated by current evidence. We review the methodology underpinning empirical data on the ecological roles of Australian dingoes (Canis lupus dingo and hybrids) to provide a comprehensive and objective benchmark for knowledge of the ecological roles of Australia's largest terrestrial predator. From a wide variety of methodological flaws, sampling bias, and experimental design constraints inherent to 38 of the 40 field studies we assessed, we demonstrate that there is presently unreliable and inconclusive evidence for dingoes' role as a biodiversity regulator. We also discuss the widespread (both taxonomically and geographically) and direct negative effects of dingoes to native fauna, and the few robust studies investigating their positive roles. In light of the highly variable and context-specific impacts of dingoes on faunal biodiversity and the inconclusive state of the literature, we strongly caution against the positive management of dingoes in the absence of a supporting evidence-base for such action.
Keyword Biodiversity conservation
Experimental design
Mesopredator release
Relative abundance indices
Threatened fauna
Trophic cascades
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Available online: 21 January 2013.

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: School of Agriculture and Food Sciences
Official 2014 Collection
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 34 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 44 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 11 Aug 2013, 10:02:55 EST by System User on behalf of School of Agriculture and Food Sciences