Sensation machine: film, phenomenology and the training of the senses

Stephens, Elizabeth (2012) Sensation machine: film, phenomenology and the training of the senses. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 26 4: 529-539. doi:10.1080/10304312.2012.698033

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Stephens, Elizabeth
Title Sensation machine: film, phenomenology and the training of the senses
Journal name Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1030-4312
Publication date 2012-01-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1080/10304312.2012.698033
Volume 26
Issue 4
Start page 529
End page 539
Total pages 11
Place of publication Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Publisher Routledge
Language eng
Abstract This paper aims to extend recent work in feminist phenomenological film theory by contextualizing its turn to the tactile within the longer history of the philosophy of the senses and their training. Following the work of Vivian Sobchack, a recent generation of feminist film theorists have drawn on phenomenological understandings of embodiment to argue that while film criticism has focused, almost exclusively, on the visible, intelligible qualities of cinema, our experience of cinema is shaped by our bodily sensations. As Sobchack (2004, 63) argues, ‘we do not see any movie only through our eyes’; rather, we ‘feel films with our whole bodily being’. This turn from the dominant sense of sight to that of touch represents a shift in critical perspective, too, as this paper will show. Whereas sight is examined for its privileged relation to knowledge, and thus understood as highly cultivated, touch is often celebrated for its potential as a site of resistance. Unlike sight, touch is often evoked as a spontaneous reaction that destabilizes assumptions about the way we make sense. This paper aims to contribute to this recent work in feminist film theory, by demonstrating that touch, too, is part of the long history of the training of the senses – in which cinema itself plays a substantial role. Rather than a critique of the relationship between sight and touch, I argue, this work represents the continuation and reconfiguration of a long history in which sight and touch have been privileged amongst the senses and conceptualized interdependently.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Version of record first published: 27 July 2012.

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
Centre for the History of European Discourses Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 14 Oct 2012, 10:05:53 EST by System User on behalf of Centre for History of European Discourses