Beyond the 'tick and flick': Facilitating best practice falls prevention through an action research approach

Lea, Emma, Andrews, Sharon, Hill, Keith, Haines, Terry, Nitz, Jennifer, Haralambous, Betty, Moore, Kirsten and Robinson, Andrew (2012) Beyond the 'tick and flick': Facilitating best practice falls prevention through an action research approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21 13-14: 1896-1905. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04121.x


Author Lea, Emma
Andrews, Sharon
Hill, Keith
Haines, Terry
Nitz, Jennifer
Haralambous, Betty
Moore, Kirsten
Robinson, Andrew
Title Beyond the 'tick and flick': Facilitating best practice falls prevention through an action research approach
Journal name Journal of Clinical Nursing   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0962-1067
1365-2702
Publication date 2012-07-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04121.x
Volume 21
Issue 13-14
Start page 1896
End page 1905
Total pages 10
Place of publication Oxford, United Kingdom
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Aims and objectives: To examine residential aged care facility staff views on using falls risk assessment tools and the implications for developing falls prevention practices in the context of an action research project.

Background: Falls risk assessments play an important role in care planning by identifying and monitoring aged care facility residents most at risk of falls. Yet while such assessments are recommended in falls prevention best practice guidelines, there is little published research that examines staff procedures and views related to conducting falls risk assessments.

Design: Falls risk assessments were undertaken in the context of an action research project. Method. Twelve staff members from two residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Tasmania formed a single Falls Action Research Group, which met 22 times over a year, providing the study's qualitative data. During this time, key group members assessed 178 residents using a new falls risk assessment tool (FROP-Resi).

Results: According to group members, facilities evolved from a 'tick-and-flick' approach to falls risk assessment to a more individualised, face-to-face assessment process. Group members perceived the process to be more meaningful and enjoyable for staff involved in the assessment process resulting in higher quality of assessments and leading to improved levels of falls awareness among staff, residents and family caregivers.

Conclusions: An action research process is useful for facilitating a new approach to falls risk assessments, engaging aged care facility staff with falls prevention and prompting improvements in falls prevention practices. Relevance to clinical practice. RACFs need to provide opportunities for staff to meet regularly to discuss practice, identify issues and take action. By doing so, staff can engage meaningfully with best practice activities such as optimising falls risk assessment processes.
Keyword Action research
Evidence-informed practice
Falls prevention
Falls risk assessment
Nursing homes
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 7 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 8 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 24 Jul 2012, 03:08:29 EST by System User on behalf of School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences