Aboriginality and the Northern Territory intervention

Alissa Macoun (2012). Aboriginality and the Northern Territory intervention PhD Thesis, School of Political Science & Internat'l Studies, The University of Queensland.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
s3335661_phd_finalthesis.pdf Macoun - PhD Final Thesis application/pdf 1.80MB 219
s333566_phd_abstract.pdf Macoun - PhD Abstract application/pdf 61.70KB 8
Author Alissa Macoun
Thesis Title Aboriginality and the Northern Territory intervention
School, Centre or Institute School of Political Science & Internat'l Studies
Institution The University of Queensland
Publication date 2012-01
Thesis type PhD Thesis
Total pages 250
Total colour pages 5
Total black and white pages 245
Language eng
Subjects 160501 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Policy
160601 Australian Government and Politics
160609 Political Theory and Political Philosophy
Abstract/Summary This thesis examines the construction of Aboriginality in recent public policy reasoning through identifying representations deployed by architects and supporters of the Commonwealth’s 2007 Northern Territory Emergency Response (the intervention). Debate about the Northern Territory intervention was explicitly situated in relation to a range of ideas about appropriate Government policy towards Indigenous people, and particularly about the nature, role, status, value and future of Aboriginality and of Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islanders. This project involves analysis of constructions of Aboriginality deployed in texts created and circulated to explain and justify the policy program. The aim of the project is to identify the ideas about Aboriginality deployed by the intervention’s architects and supporters, and to examine the effects and implications of these discourses for political relationships between Indigenous people and settlers in Australia. This thesis will argue that advocates of the Northern Territory intervention construct Aboriginality in a range of important ways that reassert and reinforce the legitimacy of the settler colonial order and the project of Australian nationhood, and operate to limit Aboriginal claims. Specifically, it is argued that in linking Aboriginality to the abuse of Aboriginal children, the intervention’s advocates and supporters establish a political debate about the nature and future of Aboriginality within a discursive terrain in which the authority and perspectives of Indigenous people are problematised. Aboriginality is constructed in this process as both temporally and spatially separated from settler society, and in need of coercive integration into mainstream economic and political arrangements. Aboriginality is depicted by settler advocates of intervention as an anachronism, with Aboriginal people and cultures understood as primitive and/or savage precursors to settlers who are represented as modern and civilised. As such, the communities seen as the authentic home or location of Aboriginality represent a threat to Aboriginal children as well as to settlers. These constructions function to obscure the violence of the settler order, provide justification or moral rehabilitation for the colonising project, and reassert the sovereignty of the settler state. The resolution offered by the intervention’s advocates is a performance or enactment of settler sovereignty, representing a claim over and through both the territory of Aboriginal people and the discursive terrain of nationhood.
Keyword Aboriginality
Northern Territory
Settler colonialism
Australian nationalism
Additional Notes 80, 85, 137, 156, 215

Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 22 Jun 2012, 10:37:20 EST by Alissa Macoun on behalf of Library - Information Access Service