Reliability and validity of a measure of role functioning among people with psychiatric disabilities

Harris, Meredith, Gladman, Beverley, Hennessy, Nicole, Lloyd, Chris, Mowry, Bryan and Waghorn, Geoffrey (2011) Reliability and validity of a measure of role functioning among people with psychiatric disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58 3: 203-208. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00921.x

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Harris, Meredith
Gladman, Beverley
Hennessy, Nicole
Lloyd, Chris
Mowry, Bryan
Waghorn, Geoffrey
Title Reliability and validity of a measure of role functioning among people with psychiatric disabilities
Journal name Australian Occupational Therapy Journal   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0045-0766
1440-1630
Publication date 2011-06-01
Year available 2011
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00921.x
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 58
Issue 3
Start page 203
End page 208
Total pages 6
Place of publication Richmond, VIC, Australia
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Aim:  The aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Socially Valued Role Classification Scale (SRCS), a domain-specific measure of role functioning designed for use with community residents with psychiatric disabilities. Test–retest reliability, concurrent validity, face validity, consumer and clinician acceptability and utility were examined.

Methods:  Sixty community residents with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated in this study where the SRCS was administered by telephone.

Results:  Test–retest reliability showed good or very good agreement for subscale scores (intraclass correlations (ICCs): 0.78–0.89) and for items capturing amount of participation in domain-specific activities (ICC: 0.67–1.00). Greater variation was observed for items capturing assistance required with activities (κ: 0.40–0.75), and standard of activities performed (κ: 0.43–1.00). Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to very good associations in the directions expected. Face validity, user acceptability and utility in telephone interviews were adequate.

Conclusions:  These findings add to previous psychometric evidence and support the continued development of the SRCS for use in community mental health settings. The SRCS has promising utility for occupational therapists involved in psychiatric rehabilitation outcome measurement.
Keyword Psychiatric disability
Recovery
Rehabilitation outcome measurement
Role functioning
Severe mental illness
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Queensland Brain Institute Publications
Official 2012 Collection
School of Public Health Publications
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 13 Dec 2011, 01:00:05 EST by Matthew Lamb on behalf of School of Medicine