Recognition of disgust is selectively preserved in Alzheimer's disease

Henry, Julie D., Ruffman, Ted, McDonald, Skye, Peek O'Leary, Marie-Andree, Phillips, Louise H., Brodaty, Henry and Rendell, Peter G. (2008) Recognition of disgust is selectively preserved in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 46 5: 1363-1370. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.012

Author Henry, Julie D.
Ruffman, Ted
McDonald, Skye
Peek O'Leary, Marie-Andree
Phillips, Louise H.
Brodaty, Henry
Rendell, Peter G.
Title Recognition of disgust is selectively preserved in Alzheimer's disease
Journal name Neuropsychologia   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0028-3932
Publication date 2008-01-01
Year available 2007
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.012
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 46
Issue 5
Start page 1363
End page 1370
Total pages 8
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publisher Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Language eng
Formatted abstract
The neural substrates that subserve decoding of different emotional expressions are subject to different rates of degeneration and atrophy in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and there is therefore reason to anticipate that a differentiated profile of affect recognition impairment may emerge. However, it remains unclear whether AD differentially affects the recognition of specific emotions. Further, there is only limited research focused on whether affect recognition deficits in AD generalize to more ecologically valid stimuli. In the present study, relatively mild AD participants (n = 24), older controls (n = 30) and younger controls (n = 30) were administered measures of affect recognition. Significant AD deficits were observed relative to both the younger and older control groups on a measure that involved labeling of static images of facial affect. AD deficits on this measure were observed in relation to all emotions assessed (anger, sadness, happiness, surprise and fear), with the exception of disgust, which was preserved even relative to the younger adult group. The relative preservation of disgust could not be attributed to biases in the choice of labels made, and it is suggested instead that this finding might reflect the relative sparing of the basal ganglia in AD. No significant AD effect was observed for the more ecologically valid measure that involved dynamic displays of facial expressions, in conjunction with paralinguistic and body movement cues, although a trend for greater AD difficulty was observed.
Keyword Emotion recognition
Facial affect recognition
Basal ganglia
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Psychology Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 47 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 53 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 20 Apr 2011, 02:01:56 EST by Lucy O'Brien on behalf of School of Psychology