The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding

Schindel, Ryan, Rowlands, Jemma and Arnold, Derek H. (2011) The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding. Journal of Vision, 11 2: 1-9. doi:10.1167/11.2.17


Author Schindel, Ryan
Rowlands, Jemma
Arnold, Derek H.
Title The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding
Journal name Journal of Vision   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1534-7362
Publication date 2011-02-24
Year available 1982
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1167/11.2.17
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 11
Issue 2
Start page 1
End page 9
Total pages 9
Editor Andrew B. Watson
Place of publication Rockville, MD, U.S.A.
Publisher Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Language eng
Formatted abstract
When a unique “oddball” stimulus is embedded in a train of repeated standard stimuli, its duration can seem relatively exaggerated (V. Pariyadath & D. Eagleman, 2007; P. U. Tse, J. Intriligator, J. Rivest, & P. Cavanagh, 2004). We explored the possibility of a link between this and signal intensity reductions at low levels of visual processing. In Experiment 1, we used Troxler fading as a metric of signal intensityVthe apparent fading of a stimulus with prolonged viewing (I. P. V. Troxler, 1804). Fading was exaggerated by presenting oddball and standard stimuli to different eyes. However, there was no fading difference when standard stimuli were presented persistently or intermittently. These results contrast with oddball effects, which were insensitive to eye of origin, and which were contingent on intermittent standard stimuli. In Experiment 2, we show that oddball effects can be elicited with oddballs that are less intense versions of repetitive stimuli, and in Experiment 3, we show that oddball effects can scale with the discrepancy between repeated and oddball stimuli. These observations discredit any oddball effect explanation predicated on low-level neural response magnitudes to individual stimuli. Instead, our data support the view that oddball effects are driven by predictive coding (V. Pariyadath & D. Eagleman, 2007), reflecting the discrepancy between expected and actual inputs.
© ARVO
Keyword Temporal vision
Attention
Duration perception
Human visual-cortex
Inhibition
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes published February 24, 2011

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2012 Collection
School of Psychology Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 22 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 27 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 20 Mar 2011, 10:07:10 EST