Judge or be judged: Accepting judicial appointment in an unlawful regime

Corrin, Jennifer (2009) Judge or be judged: Accepting judicial appointment in an unlawful regime. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 16 2 & 3: 191-209. doi:10.1080/09695951003784787

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Corrin, Jennifer
Title Judge or be judged: Accepting judicial appointment in an unlawful regime
Journal name International Journal of the Legal Profession   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0969-5958
Publication date 2009-01-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1080/09695951003784787
Volume 16
Issue 2 & 3
Start page 191
End page 209
Total pages 19
Editor Avrom Sherr
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Language eng
Subject 180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)
940406 Legal Processes
Abstract Judicial independence is generally accepted as a key component of the rule of law. It empowers judges to make unbiased decisions without concern for political repercussions. In countries governed by an unconstitutional, unlawful or corrupt regime, such as Zimbabwe,2 Swaziland,3 Pakistan4 and Fiji,5 that independence, and in turn the rule of law, is threatened. More particularly, acceptance of judicial office in an unlawful regime could be regarded as making an implicit bargain with the government to recognise its validity.6 This article begins with a discussion of the importance of judicial independence, both from a national and an international perspective. It then examines the standards of judicial integrity and some of the factors that impact upon independence, including appointment and tenure, and the less obvious influence of jurisdiction. The article then moves on to consider the issues arising from acceptance of judicial office in an illegal regime in the context of Fiji, where lawyers and judicial officers have recently been forced to decide whether or not to accept appointment in a regime with an unelected government. After outlining the background to the latest events in Fiji, the article examines the competing considerations and ethical dilemmas involved in deciding whether to accept judicial appointment in an illegal regime. It then goes on to consider the possible repercussions of accepting such appointment from both a disciplinary and criminal perspective.
Keyword Judicial independence
Rule of law
Judges
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: TC Beirne School of Law Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sat, 25 Sep 2010, 00:29:26 EST by Jane Malady on behalf of T.C. Beirne School of Law