Plagiarised studies may result in misleading metaanalyses that impact on clinical guideline development

Ting, Joseph (2006) Plagiarised studies may result in misleading metaanalyses that impact on clinical guideline development. BMJ, 333 7568: 594-596. doi:10.1136/bmj.38968.611296.F7


Author Ting, Joseph
Title Plagiarised studies may result in misleading metaanalyses that impact on clinical guideline development
Journal name BMJ
ISSN 0959-8146
0959-8138
Publication date 2006-09-14
Sub-type Letter to editor, brief commentary or brief communication
DOI 10.1136/bmj.38968.611296.F7
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 333
Issue 7568
Start page 594
End page 596
Total pages 3
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher B M J Group
Language eng
Keyword Clinical studies
Efficacy
Q-Index Code CX
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ
Additional Notes Rapid Response to: 'Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak' by Iain Chalmers

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Letter to editor, brief commentary or brief communication
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
ERA 2012 Admin Only
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 54 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 18 Dec 2009, 00:09:43 EST by Christine Ouslinis on behalf of Faculty Of Health Sciences