Estrogens in Swiss rivers and effluents: Sampling matters

Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M., Eggen, Rik I. L, Escher, Beate I. and Suter, Marc J. F. (2008) Estrogens in Swiss rivers and effluents: Sampling matters. CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry, 62 5: 389-394. doi:10.2533/chimia.2008.389

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ186430_OA.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 599.59KB 0

Author Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.
Eggen, Rik I. L
Escher, Beate I.
Suter, Marc J. F.
Title Estrogens in Swiss rivers and effluents: Sampling matters
Journal name CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0009-4293
Publication date 2008-05-01
Year available 2008
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.2533/chimia.2008.389
Open Access Status File (Publisher version)
Volume 62
Issue 5
Start page 389
End page 394
Total pages 6
Publisher Swiss Chemical Society
Language eng
Subject 05 Environmental Sciences
0502 Environmental Science and Management
Abstract Estrogenic activity of treated sewage effluents and receiving waters surfaced as an issue of general concern some 15 years ago. Since then, a large number of studies investigated the distribution and nature of the estrogenic substances in various aquatic ecosystems. Within NRP50, a five-year Swiss research programme on endocrine disruptors, four field studies were performed to characterize the presence of environmental estrogens in rivers and effluents. The estrogenic activity was quantified with a biological assay - the yeast estrogen screen. An overview of the sampling approaches and results of the various studies is presented here. In a first study, using grab sampling, it appeared that estrogenic activity in river water was highly variable. Average estrogenicity values did not correlate with sewage treatment works and/or river characteristics, e.g. effluent dilution factor. However, variability was not 'random' but clearly associated with river size, and possibly its discharge. A second study specifically addressed this issue of variability of estrogenicity. The study was conducted at a single effluent source and its receiving river. Variability of estrogenicity in the grab samples was again large but again not 'random'; some of the variability was explained by the time over which the effluent resided in the treatment process. In a third study it was explored if passive sampling would be a better way to assess average estrogenicity. Indeed, passive samplers identified sources of estrogens, and passive sampling data correlated well with both repeated grab sampling and bioaccumulation data. Subsequently, passive samplers were deployed across Switzerland in a fourth study. It involved 22 effluent discharges and the associated rivers. Data analysis of the last study is still ongoing, preliminary observations are discussed here. Although a lot could be learned from repeated grab sampling campaigns, it emerged that passive sampling is a very effective and appropriate technique to assess: i) effluent treatment efficiency, and ii) the chemical load of river water. For these reasons it is a valuable monitoring tool for water quality criteria assessments as well as for studies that aim to link exposure and effect. The passive samplers that are currently available not only target estrogenic substances, but many other polar organic compounds of concern, such as antibiotics (see NRP49), other pharmaceuticals and biocides.
Keyword Endocrine disruption
Estrogenic activity
Passive sampling
River water
Treated sewage effluent
Treatment-plant effluents
Sewage-treatment works
Aquatic environments
Endocrine Disruption
organic pollutants
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 17 Nov 2009, 19:50:22 EST