Opinions on the content and effects of clinical practice guidelines for CKD: A survey of nephrologists in Australia and New Zealand

Irving, Michelle J., Johnson, David W., McDonald, Stephen, Walker, Rowan G., Frommer, Michael S. and Craig, Jonathan C. (2009) Opinions on the content and effects of clinical practice guidelines for CKD: A survey of nephrologists in Australia and New Zealand. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 53 6: 1082-1090. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.037


Author Irving, Michelle J.
Johnson, David W.
McDonald, Stephen
Walker, Rowan G.
Frommer, Michael S.
Craig, Jonathan C.
Title Opinions on the content and effects of clinical practice guidelines for CKD: A survey of nephrologists in Australia and New Zealand
Journal name American Journal of Kidney Diseases   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0272-6386
1523-6838
Publication date 2009-06-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.037
Open Access Status
Volume 53
Issue 6
Start page 1082
End page 1090
Total pages 9
Place of publication New York, United States
Publisher W.B. Saunders Co.
Language eng
Subject 2727 Nephrology
Abstract Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been a major development in nephrology internationally, but it is uncertain how the nephrology community regards these guidelines. This study aimed to determine the views of nephrologists on the content and effects of their local guidelines (Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment [CARI]). In 2006, a self-administered survey was distributed to all Australian and New Zealand nephrologists. Seven questions were repeated from a similar survey in 2002. A total of 211 nephrologists (70% of practicing nephrologists) responded. More than 90% agreed that the CARI guidelines were a useful summary of evidence, and nearly 60% reported that the guidelines had significantly influenced their practice. The proportion of nephrologists reporting that the guidelines had improved patient outcomes increased from 14% in 2002 to 38% in 2006. The proportion of nephrologists indicating that the guidelines did not match the best available evidence decreased from 30% in 2002 to 8% in 2006. Older age and male sex showed some associations with a less favorable response for some domains. The CARI approach of rigorous evidence-based guidelines has been shown to be a successful model of guideline production. Almost all nephrologists regarded the CARI guidelines as useful evidence summaries, although only one-third believed that the guidelines affected health outcomes. Attitudes to the guidelines have become more favorable over time; this may reflect changes in the CARI process or attitudinal changes to evidence among nephrologists. Evaluation by the end user is fundamental to ensuring the applicability of guidelines in clinical practice in the future.
Keyword Kidney
Guidelines
Implementation
Survey
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Published under Special Article

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 03 Sep 2009, 18:01:08 EST by Mr Andrew Martlew on behalf of Medicine - Princess Alexandra Hospital