Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents

Morin, L., Reid, A. M., Sims-Chilton, N. M., Buckley, Y. M., Dhileepan, K., Hastwell, G. T., Nordblom, T. L. and Raghu, S. (2009) Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents. Biological Control, 51 1: 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.017

Author Morin, L.
Reid, A. M.
Sims-Chilton, N. M.
Buckley, Y. M.
Dhileepan, K.
Hastwell, G. T.
Nordblom, T. L.
Raghu, S.
Title Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents
Journal name Biological Control   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1049-9644
Publication date 2009-06-23
Year available 2009
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.017
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 51
Issue 1
Start page 1
End page 15
Total pages 15
Editor G. E. Heimpel
M. Coll
R. Charudattan
Place of publication United States
Publisher Academic Press
Language eng
Subject C1
9604 Control of Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species
06 Biological Sciences
Abstract We review key issues, available approaches and analyses to encourage and assist practitioners to develop sound plans to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents at various phases throughout a program. Assessing the effectiveness of prospective agents before release assists the selection process, while post-release evaluation aims to determine the extent that agents are alleviating the ecological, social and economic impacts of the weeds. Information gathered on weed impacts prior to the initiation of a biological control program is necessary to provide baseline data and devise performance targets against which the program can subsequently be evaluated. Detailed data on weed populations, associated plant communities and, in some instances ecosystem processes collected at representative sites in the introduced range several years before the release of agents can be compared with similar data collected later to assess agent effectiveness. Laboratory, glasshouse and field studies are typically used to assess agent effectiveness. While some approaches used for field studies may be influenced by confounding factors, manipulative experiments where agents are excluded (or included) using chemicals or cages are more robust but time-consuming and expensive to implement. Demographic modeling and benefit–cost analyses are increasingly being used to complement other studies. There is an obvious need for more investment in long-term post-release evaluation of agent effectiveness to rigorously document outcomes of biological control programs.
Keyword Weed biological control
Invasive plants
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Online Pub. June 2009 in press

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: 2010 Higher Education Research Data Collection
School of Biological Sciences Publications
Ecology Centre Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 58 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 61 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 14 Jul 2009, 00:02:45 EST by Hayley Ware on behalf of School of Biological Sciences