Comparison of two different approaches for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study: an application to work related risk factors for low back pain

Hoogendoorn, W. E., Bongers, P. M., de Vet, H. C., Twisk, J. W., van Mechelen, W. and Bouter, L. M. (2002) Comparison of two different approaches for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study: an application to work related risk factors for low back pain. Occupational And Environmental Medicine, 59 7: 459-465. doi:10.1136/oem.59.7.459


Author Hoogendoorn, W. E.
Bongers, P. M.
de Vet, H. C.
Twisk, J. W.
van Mechelen, W.
Bouter, L. M.
Title Comparison of two different approaches for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study: an application to work related risk factors for low back pain
Journal name Occupational And Environmental Medicine   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1351-0711
Publication date 2002-07-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1136/oem.59.7.459
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 59
Issue 7
Start page 459
End page 465
Total pages 7
Place of publication London
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Language eng
Subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Abstract Aims: To compare the results of a traditional approach using standard regression for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study with the results of generalised estimating equations (GEE) analysis. Methods: The research was part of a three year prospective cohort study on work related risk factors for low back pain. The study population consisted of a cohort of 1192 workers with no low back pain at baseline. Information on work related physical and psychosocial factors and the occurrence of low back pain was obtained by means of questionnaires at baseline and at the three annual follow up measurements. In a traditional standard logistic regression model, physical and psychosocial risk factors at baseline were related to the cumulative incidence of low back pain during the three year follow up period. In a GEE logistic model, repeated measurements of the physical and psychosocial risk factors were related to low back pain reported at one measurement point later. Results: The traditional standard regression model showed a significant effect of flexion and/or rotation of the upper part of the body (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.0), but not of moving heavy loads (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 0.7 to 3.1). The GEE model showed a significant effect of both flexion and/or rotation of the upper part of the body (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.3) and moving heavy loads (OR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.4). No significant associations with low back pain were found for the psychosocial work characteristics with either method, but the GEE model showed weaker odds ratios for these variables than the traditional standard regression model. Conclusions: Results show that there are differences between the two analytical approaches in both the magnitude and the precision of the observed odds ratios.
Keyword cohort studies
generalised estimating equations
longitudinal studies
low back pain
repeated measurement
risk factors
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 40 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 37 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 12 May 2009, 22:17:23 EST by Sophie Jordan on behalf of Library Corporate Services