The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational healthcare

Steenstra, A., Anema, J. R., Bongers, P. M., de Vet, H. C. W., Knol, D. L. and van Mechelen, W. (2006) The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational healthcare. Occupational And Environmental Medicine, 63 11: 718-725. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.021675


Author Steenstra, A.
Anema, J. R.
Bongers, P. M.
de Vet, H. C. W.
Knol, D. L.
van Mechelen, W.
Title The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational healthcare
Journal name Occupational And Environmental Medicine   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1351-0711
Publication date 2006-11-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1136/oem.2005.021675
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 63
Issue 11
Start page 718
End page 725
Total pages 8
Place of publication London
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Language eng
Subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Formatted abstract
Background: Low back pain is a common medical and social problem associated with disability and absence from work. Knowledge on effective return to work (RTW) interventions is scarce.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of graded activity as part of a multistage RTW programme.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Occupational healthcare.

Subjects: 112 workers absent from work for more than eight weeks due to low back pain were randomised to either graded activity (n = 55) or usual care (n = 57).

Intervention
: Graded activity, a physical exercise programme aimed at RTW based on operant-conditioning behavioural principles.

Main outcome measures
: The number of days off work until first RTW for more then 28 days, total number of days on sick leave during follow up, functional status, and severity of pain. Follow up was 26 weeks.

Results: Graded activity prolonged RTW. Median time until RTW was equal to the total number of days on sick leave and was 139 (IQR = 69) days in the graded activity group and 111 (IQR = 76) days in the usual care group (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.86). An interaction between a prior workplace intervention and graded activity, together with a delay in the start of the graded activity intervention, explained most of the delay in RTW (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.84 without prior intervention and 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81 with prior intervention). Graded activity did not improve pain or functional status clinically significantly.

Conclusions: Graded activity was not effective for any of the outcome measures. Different interventions combined can lead to a delay in RTW. Delay in referral to graded activity delays RTW. In implementing graded activity special attention should be paid to the structure and process of care.

Abbreviations: GP, general practitioner; OP, occupational physician; PT, physiotherapist; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RTW, return to work
Keyword low back pain
graded activity
randomised controlled trial
effectiveness
cognitive behavioural
return-to-work
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 41 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 40 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 03 Apr 2009, 01:33:16 EST by Maryanne Watson on behalf of School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences