Metabolic pathway analysis for rational design of L-methionine production by Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum

Kromer, Jens Olaf, Wittman, Christoph, Schroder, Hartwig and Heinzle, Elmar (2006) Metabolic pathway analysis for rational design of L-methionine production by Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metabolic Engineering, 8 4: 353-369. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2006.02.001


Author Kromer, Jens Olaf
Wittman, Christoph
Schroder, Hartwig
Heinzle, Elmar
Title Metabolic pathway analysis for rational design of L-methionine production by Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum
Journal name Metabolic Engineering   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1096-7184
1096-7176
Publication date 2006-07-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.02.001
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 8
Issue 4
Start page 353
End page 369
Total pages 17
Place of publication United States
Publisher Academic Press
Language eng
Subject 060101 Analytical Biochemistry
060104 Cell Metabolism
060114 Systems Biology
Abstract Metabolic pathway analysis was carried out to predict the metabolic potential of Corynebacterium glutamicum and Escherichia coli for the production of L-methionine. Based on detailed stoichiometric models for these organisms, this allowed the calculation of the theoretically optimal methionine yield and related metabolic fluxes for various scenarios involving different mutants and process conditions. The theoretical optimal methionine yield on the substrates glucose, sulfate and ammonia for the wildtype of C. glutamicum is 0.49 (C-mol) (C-mol)1, whereas the E. coli wildtype exhibits an even higher potential of 0.52 (C-mol) (C-mol)1. Both strains showed completely different optimal flux distributions. C. glutamicum has a high flux through the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), whereas the TCA cycle flux is very low. Additionally, it recruits a metabolic cycle, which involves 2-oxoglutarate and glutamate. In contrast, E. coli does minimize the flux through the PPP, and the flux through the TCA cycle is high. The improved potential of the E. coli wildtype is due to its membrane-bound transhydrogenase and its glycine cleavage system as shown by additional simulations with theoretical mutants. A key point for maximizing methionine yield is the choice of the sulfur source. Replacing sulfate by thiosulfate or sulfide increased the maximal theoretical yield in C. glutamicum up to 0.68 (C-mol) (C-mol)1. A further increase is possible by the application of additional C1 sources. The highest theoretical potential was obtained for C. glutamicum applying methanethiol as combined source for C1 carbon and sulfur (0.91 (C-mol) (C-mol)1). Substrate requirement for maintenance purposes reduces theoretical methionine yields. In the case of sulfide used as sulfur source a maintenance requirement of 9.2 mmolATP g1 h1, as was observed under stress conditions, would reduce the maximum theoretical yield from 67.8% to 47% at a methionine production rate of 0.65 mmol g1 h1. The enormous capability of both organisms encourages the development of biotechnological methionine production, whereby the use of metabolic pathway analysis, as shown, provides valuable advice for future strategies in strain and process improvement.
Keyword Elementary modes
Methionine
Corynebacterium glutamicum
E. coli
Sulfur
Methanethiol
Thiosulfate
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 69 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 81 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 12 Feb 2009, 19:48:34 EST by Paul Rollo on behalf of Aust Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology