Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study

Zalaudek, I., Argenziano, G., Soyer, H. P., Corona, R., Sera, F., Blum, A., Braun, R. P., Cabo, H., Ferrara, G., Kopf, A. W., Langford, D., Menzies, S. W., Pellacani, G., Peris, K. and Seidenari, S. (2006) Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study. British Journal of Dermatology, 154 3: 431-437. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06983.x


Author Zalaudek, I.
Argenziano, G.
Soyer, H. P.
Corona, R.
Sera, F.
Blum, A.
Braun, R. P.
Cabo, H.
Ferrara, G.
Kopf, A. W.
Langford, D.
Menzies, S. W.
Pellacani, G.
Peris, K.
Seidenari, S.
Title Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study
Journal name British Journal of Dermatology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1365-2133
0007-0963
Publication date 2006-03-01
Year available 2006
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06983.x
Volume 154
Issue 3
Start page 431
End page 437
Total pages 7
Place of publication London
Publisher Blackwell
Language eng
Subject 110304 Dermatology
Formatted abstract
Background
In a pilot study, the three-point checklist of dermoscopy has been shown to represent a valid and reproducible tool with high sensitivity for the diagnosis of skin cancer in the hands of a small group of nonexperts.

Objectives
To re-evaluate these preliminary results in a large number of observers independently from their profession and expertise in dermoscopy.

Methods
The study was conducted via the internet to provide worldwide access for participants. After a short web-based tutorial, the participants evaluated dermoscopic images of 165 (116 benign and 49 malignant) skin lesions (15 training and 150 test lesions). For each lesion participants scored the presence of the three-point checklist criteria (asymmetry, atypical network and blue-white structures). Kappa values, odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were estimated.

Results
Overall, 150 participants joined the study. The three-point checklist showed good interobserver reproducibility (kappa value: 0·53). Sensitivity for skin cancer (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma) was 91·0% and this value remained basically uninfluenced by the observers' professional profile. Only 20 participants lacking any experience in dermoscopy performed significantly more poorly, but the sensitivity was still remarkably high (86·7%) when considering that they were untrained novices in dermoscopy. The specificity was 71·9% and was significantly influenced by the profession, with dermatologists performing best.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that the three-point checklist is a feasible, simple, accurate and reproducible skin cancer screening tool.
Keyword Dermoscopy
Diagnosis
Melanoma
Pigmented skin lesions
skin cancer
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 47 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 53 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 22 Jan 2009, 19:47:06 EST by Marianne Steentsma on behalf of School of Medicine