Diversity and economic evolution: Failures of competitive economic systems

Tisdell, C. A. (1999) Diversity and economic evolution: Failures of competitive economic systems. Contemporary Economic Policy, 17 2: 156-165.

Author Tisdell, C. A.
Title Diversity and economic evolution: Failures of competitive economic systems
Journal name Contemporary Economic Policy   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1074-3529
Publication date 1999-01-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
Volume 17
Issue 2
Start page 156
End page 165
Total pages 10
Place of publication Oxford, UK
Publisher Oxford Univ. Press
Language eng
Subject C1
340205 Industry Economics and Industrial Organisation
720204 Industry policy
Abstract This paper has two themes. First, diversity of relevant attributes driving the dynamics of socioeconomic systems, including industrial systems' is often needed to increase their likelihood of transiting to a superior state. However systems left to their own devices do not always evolve to states where they possess sufficient or optimal diversity for further evolution or growth to a superior state. Evolutionary market mechanisms can be of this nature. Structural adjustment policies and globalization seem to be adding to industrial and other types of uniformity. Hence, real danger exists that global industrial structures influenced by field effects will become piled up and reduce the likelihood of the global economic system evolving to a superior economic state. Furthermore, diversity is an important driving force in other growth processes, e.g., those adding to the stock of knowledge. Second industrial diversity of techniques and behaviors may be potentially Paretian valuable as a means of optimal adjustment to continual technological change and as a manifestation of specialization according to differences in individual abilities and in those of organizations. Insofar as attempts at benchmarking try to ensure uniform adoption of best practice in industry, they are likely to be doubly damaging because short-nln potential Paretian benefits are forgone, and in stifling industrial diversity they may also undermine industrial diversity as a source of future economic growth.
Keyword Economics
Public Administration
Growth
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: School of Economics Publications
Ecology Centre Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 11 Jun 2008, 01:51:38 EST