Does Recruitment Lead to Retention? Rural Clinical School Training Experiences and Subsequent Intern Choices

Eley, Diann and Baker, Peter (2006) Does Recruitment Lead to Retention? Rural Clinical School Training Experiences and Subsequent Intern Choices. Rural and Remote Health, 6 1: 1-13.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Does_recruitment.pdf Does_recruitment.pdf application/pdf 107.35KB 213

Author Eley, Diann
Baker, Peter
Title Does Recruitment Lead to Retention? Rural Clinical School Training Experiences and Subsequent Intern Choices
Journal name Rural and Remote Health  (ERA 2012 Listed)    (ERA 2010 Rank C)   Check publisher's open access policy
Publication date 2006-02-01
Sub-type Article
Volume number 6
Issue number 1
ISSN 1445-6354
Start page 1
End page 13
Total pages 13
Editor Paul Worley
Place of publication Deakin West, ACT, Australia
Publisher Australian Rural Health Education Network
Language eng
Subject 339999 Other Education
320100 Medicine - General
Formatted abstract Introduction:
The Australian Rural Clinical Schools, established nationally in 2000-2001, have provided an opportunity for medical students to undertake their clinical training across a network of hospitals, general practice surgeries and community medical centres in locations throughout Australia. The Rural Clinical School at the University of Queensland was established in 2002, as the Rural Clinical Division (RCD) of the School of Medicine, which provides a four-year graduate MB BS program. Students may elect to train in their 3rd and/or 4th year in one of three clinical divisions, namely Central, Southern (both based in Brisbane) or Rural which comprises teaching sites in south west Queensland and central Queensland region. Training must be of an equivalent nature throughout these three divisions, because students all sit the same examinations. Rigorous evaluation of the RCD teaching program underpins the goals of continuing improvement of both education and resources, and is also a key component of the reporting mechanisms linked to ongoing Commonwealth funding. Students' perception of their medical education at the RCD is the major focus of such evaluations in order to assist both educational improvement and required student recruitment. With this in mind, a questionnaire, the 'Year 4 Exit Survey' was developed to evaluate medical student perceptions of their 4th year experience at the RCD. Coupled to this was an analysis of internship choices to evaluate the important related issue of medical graduate retention. Objective: The increasing popularity of the RCD has prompted further investigation into the intern placement choice by these students. The provision of a positive medical education experience in a Rural Clinical School might be expected to influence this intern choice to favour a rural location. This preliminary report provides the results of the evaluations by one cohort of year 4 students and explores the relationship between rural undergraduate medical training experiences and subsequent recruitment and retention of junior medical personnel within local rural hospitals.

Methods:
The Year 4 Exit Survey contained 63 questions and was a combination of open-ended and forced answer items. The survey was divided into the following sections: demographics, career interests, experience of rural living, interest in rural medical practice, perceptions of rural communities, perceptions of the RCD, rating of their medical training, the impact of the RCD on their desire to practice medicine in a rural area, their opinions on the most and least valuable study experiences at either site and their suggestions on how that experience might be improved. A final question asked them their choice of internship location and the reasons why they were or were not staying at their present RCD site.

Results:
Overall there was a high degree of student satisfaction with all aspects of their medical education. However there was a discrepancy between these findings and subsequent internship choices. Reasons for this discrepancy were associated with the students' adverse perceptions of their future workforce environment and professional support.

Conclusions:
Provision of positive rural training experiences and quality medical education has been shown to increase interest in rural medicine and encourage a desire to pursue a medical career in a rural area. However a quality undergraduate rural medical education does not guarantee immediate transition to rural internship. If the ultimate goal of improving the rural medical workforce is to be achieved, the present high levels of recruitment by the Rural Clinical Schools and their provision of a positive rural training experience must be matched by a supportive clinical workplace environment. Studies are needed to look more closely at the transition period between medical graduate and intern.
Keyword Internship choice
Medical education
Medical students
Rural clinical schools
Rural recruitment and retention
References 1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Workforce Education and Training - Rural Clinical Schools (online) April 2002 Available: (Accessed 3 November 2005). 2. Bushy A, Leipert B. Factors that influence students in choosing rural nursing practice: a pilot study. Rural and Remote Health 5: 387. (Online) 2005. Available: (Accessed 3 November 2005). 3. Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch C, Lockyer-Stevens V. What makes it really good, makes it really bad. An exploration of early student experience in the first cohort of the Rural Clinical School in the University of Western Australia. Rural and Remote Health 4: 300. (Online) 2004. Available: (Accessed 3 November 2005). 4. Igumbor EU, Kwizera EN. The positive impact of rural medical schools on rural intern choices. Rural and Remote Health; 5: 417. (Online) 2005. Available: (Accessed 3 November 2005). 5. Shannon CK, Baker H, Jackson J, Roy A, Heady H, Gunel E. Evaluation of a required state-wide interdisciplinary rural health education program: student attitudes, career intents and perceived quality. Education for Health 2005; 18: 395-404. 6. Wilkinson D, Birk J, Davies L, Margolis S, Baker P. Preliminary evidence from Queensland that rural clinical schools have a positive impact on rural intern choices. Rural and Remote Health 4: 340. (Online) 2004. Available: (Accessed 3 November 2005). 7. Zorzi A, Rourke J, Kennard M, Peterson ME, Miller KJ. Combined research and clinical learning make rural summer studentship program a successful model. Education for Health 2005; 18: 329-337. 8. De Witt DE, McLean R, Newbury J, Shannon D, Critchley J. Development of a common national questionnaire to evaluate student perceptions about the Australian Rural Clinical Schools Program. Rural and Remote Health 5: 486. (Online) 2005. Available (Accessed 13 December 2005). 9. Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee (AMWAC). Doctors in vocational training: rural background and rural practice intentions. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2005; 13: 14-20. 10. Australian Rural and Remote Workforce Agencies Group. Review of the Rural and Remote Metropolitan Areas Classification System. (Online) 2005. Available (Accessed 13 November 2005). 11. Dunbabin J, Levit L. Rural origin and rural medical exposure: their impact on the rural and remote medical workforce in Australia. Rural and Remote Health 3: 212. (Online) 2003. Available from (Accessed 3 November 2005). 12. Laven G, Wilkinson D. Rural doctors and rural backgrounds: how strong is the evidence? A systematic review. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2003; 11: 277-284. 13. Wilkinson D. Evidence-based rural workforce policy: an enduring challenge. Rural and Remote Health 3: 224. (Online) 2003. Available (Accessed 3 November 2005). 14. Wilkinson D, Beilby JJ, Thompson DJ, Laven GA, Chamberlain L, Laurence COM. Associations between rural background and where South Australian general practitioners work. Medical Journal of Australia 2000; 173: 137-140. 15. Woloschuck W, Tarrant M. Does a rural educational experience influence students’ likelihood of rural practice? Impact of student background and gender. Medical Education 2002; 36: 241-247. 16. Rabinowitz HK, Diamond JJ, Marham FW, Paynter NP. Critical factors for designing programs to increase the supply and retention of rural primary care physicians. Journal of American Medical Association 2001; 286: 1041-1048.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 19 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 390 Abstract Views, 213 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 12 Apr 2006, 10:00:00 EST by Diann Eley on behalf of School of Nursing and Midwifery