The shape of the socioeconomic-oral health gradient: implications for theoretical explanations

Sanders, Anne E., Slade, Gary D., Turrell, Gavin, Spencer, A. John and Marcenes, Wagner (2006) The shape of the socioeconomic-oral health gradient: implications for theoretical explanations. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 34 4: 310-319. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00286.x


Author Sanders, Anne E.
Slade, Gary D.
Turrell, Gavin
Spencer, A. John
Marcenes, Wagner
Title The shape of the socioeconomic-oral health gradient: implications for theoretical explanations
Journal name Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0301-5661
1600-0528
Publication date 2006-08
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00286.x
Volume 34
Issue 4
Start page 310
End page 319
Total pages 10
Place of publication Oxford
Publisher Blackwell Publishing
Collection year 2006
Language eng
Subject CX
Formatted abstract
Objectives: The nature of the relationship between status and health has theoretical and applied significance. To compare the shape of the socioeconomic -oral health relationship using a measure of relative social status (MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status) and a measure of absolute material resource (equivalised household income); to investigate the contribution of behaviour in attenuating the socioeconomic gradient in oral health status; and to comment on three hypothesised explanatory mechanisms for this relationship (material, psychosocial, behavioural).

Methods: In 2003, cross-sectional self-report data were collected from 2,915 adults aged 43–57 years in Adelaide, Australia using a stratified cluster design. Oral conditions were (1) <24 teeth, (2) 1+ impact/s reported fairly often or very often on the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile; (3) fair or poor self-rated oral health, and (4) low satisfaction with chewing ability. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (PR, 95%CI) were calculated from a logistic regression model. Covariates were age, sex, country of birth, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, frequencies of toothbrushing and interdental cleaning.

Results: There was an approximately linear relationship of decreasing prevalence for each oral condition across quintiles of increasing relative social status. In the fully adjusted model the gradient was steepest for low satisfaction with chewing (PR = 4.1, 95%CI = 3.0–5.4). Using equivalised household income, the shape more closely resembled a threshold effect, with an approximate halving of the prevalence ratio between the first and second social status quintiles for the adverse impact of oral conditions and fair or poor self-rated oral health. Adjustment for covariates did not attenuate the magnitude of PRs.

Conclusion: The nature of the relationship between social status and oral conditions differed according to the measure used to index social status. Perception of relative social standing followed an approximately straight-line relationship. In contrast, there was a discrete threshold of income below which oral health deteriorated, suggesting that the benefit to oral health of material resources occurs mostly at the lower end of the across the full socioeconomic distribution.
Keyword dental health surveys
income
inequalities
middle aged
social hierarchy
Q-Index Code CX

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: School of Dentistry Publications
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 74 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 74 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 15 Aug 2007, 09:23:49 EST