Tradition and technology: Teaching rural medicine using an internet discussion board

Baker, Peter, Eley, Diann and Lasserre, Kaye (2005) Tradition and technology: Teaching rural medicine using an internet discussion board. Rural and Remote Health, 5 4: 1-8.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ7739_OA.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 199.01KB 1
Author Baker, Peter
Eley, Diann
Lasserre, Kaye
Title Tradition and technology: Teaching rural medicine using an internet discussion board
Journal name Rural and Remote Health   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1445-6354
Publication date 2005-11-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
Open Access Status File (Publisher version)
Volume 5
Issue 4
Start page 1
End page 8
Total pages 8
Editor Paul Worley
Place of publication Deakin West, ACT, Australia
Publisher Australian Rural Health Education Network
Language eng
Subject 320000 Medical and Health Sciences
Formatted abstract
Introduction:
The aim of the Rural Medicine Rotation (RMR) at the University of Queensland is to give all third year medical students exposure to, and an understanding of, clinical practice in Australian rural or remote locations. Because the primary role of the Rural Clinical School is to improve medical recruitment and retention in rural areas, the provision of positive student learning experiences and subsequent ability to make adequately informed rural career choices is of fundamental importance. A difficulty in achieving this is the relatively short period of student clinical placements, in only one or two rural or remote locations. A web-based Clinical Discussion Board (CDB) has been introduced to address this problem by allowing students at all clinical sites to discuss their rural experiences and clinical issues with each other. The rationale behind the CDB is to encourage an enhanced understanding of the breadth and depth of rural medicine through peer-based learning.

Methods:
All third year students undertaking the RMR are required to submit a minimum of two original contributions, on any clinically related topic, and two replies to other submissions on the CDB. At the end of their 8 week rotation, the students evaluate the CDB by answering a short survey that focuses on the ease of use and access and the educational value of the CDB. A question regarding the influence of the RMR on their interest in pursuing a rural medicine career is also asked. The CDB transcripts are further analysed for type of article posted, category of medicine that was discussed and the specific topic under discussion.

Results:

This article reports on the results from the first two RMR of 2005. A total of 83 third year medical students undergoing an 8 week rural rotation posted a total of 819 responses on the CDB. This resulted in 217 individual articles or topics discussed within 12 broad medical categories. The student ratings of the ease of use and access of the CDB were high, as were their ratings of its educational value and its potential to increase knowledge of rural medicine. Likewise, the majority of students felt the RMR increased their interest in rural medicine.

Conclusions:

The CDB offers a unique way to understand the concerns and interests of third year medical students immersed in their RMR. It highlights the issues they need to discuss with their peers, and offers the potential to guide future curriculum changes in response to identified needs. A major advantage of the CDB is its ability to enable all students to access a wide variety of rural practice experiences by sharing ideas and strategies they encounter. Likewise, the CBD encourages the development of deep reflective patterns of learning through a peer-based process. Equally important is the potential for building professional networks, interpersonal relationships, teamwork, collaboration and collegial support systems. These networks and relationships are essential for rural medicine to help alleviate the possible isolation recognised in rural life.
Keyword Medical education
Medicine rotation
Peer-based learning
Web-based discussion boards
References 1. Bunker A, Ellis R. Using bulletin boards for learning: What do staff and students need to know in order to use boards effectively? In: A Hermann and MM Kulski (Eds). Expanding Horizons in Teaching and Learning. Proceedings, 10th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 7-9 February 2001. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Available: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2001/bunker.html (Accessed 28 February 2005). 2. Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. Assessing for Understanding. London: Routledge, 1992; 181-213. 3. Witham SA, Krockover GH, Ridgway KD, Zinsmeister WJ. Lessons online: Educational technology for the undergraduate geology classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching 2002; 32: 264-269. 4. Fyfe S. Collaborative learning at a distance: The Human Biology experience. In: A Herrmann and MM Kulski (Eds), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Available: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/fyfes.html (Accessed 15 April 2005). 5. Land SM, Dornisch MM. A case study of student use of asynchronous bulletin board systems (BBS) to support reflection and evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 2002; 30: 365-377. 6. Sheard J, Ceddia J, Hurst J, Tuovinen J. Inferring student learning behaviour from website interactions; a usage analysis. Education and Information Technologies 2003; 8: 245-266. 7. Barker S. Introducing group work and communication skills for external students: an analysis of the use of asynchronous online tools. In, G Crisp, D Thiele, I Scholten, S Barker and J Baron (Eds). Interact, Integrate, Impact. Proceedings, 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education; 7-10 December 2003; Adelaide, South Australia. 8. Wiecha JM, Gramling R, Joachim P, Vanderschmidt H. Collaborative e-learning using streaming video and asynchronous discussion boards to teach the cognitive foundation of medical interviewing: a case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003; 5: e13. 9. Hoskins SL, van Hooff JC. Motivation and ability: which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology 2005; 36: 177-192. 10. Broudo M, Walsh C. MEDICOL: online learning in medicine and dentistry. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2002; 77: 926-927. 11. Walker J, Thomson A, Smith, P. Maximising the world wide web for high quality educational and clinical support to health and medical professionals in rural areas. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1998; 50: 287-291. 12. Armstrong EG, MacKey M, Spear SJ. Medical education as a process management problem. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2004; 79: 721-728. 13. Lawson KA, Chew M, Van Der Weyden MB. The new Australian medical schools: daring to be different. Medical Journal of Australia 2004; 181: 662-666. 14. Lindsay-North JL. Incorporating a course website into teaching: a promising practice, especially for teacher education. 2000. (ERIC ED447077). Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ (Accessed 21 November 2005). 15. Luca J, McLoughlin C. Peers supporting peers through structured bulletin boards. In: N Smythe (Ed.). Digital voyages. Proceedings, Apple University Consortium Conference, 23 September -1 October 2003. Canberra: Apple Computer Australia. 16. Breen L, Drew N, Pike L, Pooley JA, Young A. Evaluation of the School of Psychology Peer Mentoring Program - Semester 1, 2000. In: A Herrmann and MM Kulski (Eds). Expanding Horizons in Teaching and Learning. Proceedings, 10th Annual Teaching Learning Forum; 7-9 February 2001. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Available: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2001/breen.html (Accessed 28 September 2005). 17. Crouch M, Richardson G, Reid S. Enhancing patient-based learning: introducing STRAC and the reflective history template. Rural and Remote Health 5: 368. (Online) 2005. Available: http://rrh.deakin.edu.au (Accessed 13 June 2005).
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: 2006 Higher Education Research Data Collection
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 22 Nov 2006, 10:00:00 EST by Diann Eley on behalf of Social Sciences and Humanities Library Service