Two empirical hydrocyclone models revisited

Nageswararao, K, Wiseman, DM and Napier-Munn, TJ (2004) Two empirical hydrocyclone models revisited. Minerals Engineering, 17 5: 671-687. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2004.01.017

Author Nageswararao, K
Wiseman, DM
Napier-Munn, TJ
Title Two empirical hydrocyclone models revisited
Journal name Minerals Engineering   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0892-6875
Publication date 2004
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.mineng.2004.01.017
Volume 17
Issue 5
Start page 671
End page 687
Total pages 17
Editor B.A. Wills
Place of publication Oxford, UK
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Collection year 2004
Language eng
Subject C1
290702 Mineral Processing
640300 First Stage Treatment of Ores and Minerals
Abstract There has been an abundance of literature on the modelling of hydrocyclones over the past 30 years. However, in the comminution area at least, the more popular commercially available packages (e.g. JKSimMet, Limn, MODSIM) use the models developed by Nageswararao and Plitt in the 1970s, either as published at that time, or with minor modification. With the benefit of 30 years of hindsight, this paper discusses the assumptions and approximations used in developing these models. Differences in model structure and the choice of dependent and independent variables are also considered. Redundancies are highlighted and an assessment made of the general applicability of each of the models, their limitations and the sources of error in their model predictions. This paper provides the latest version of the Nageswararao model based on the above analysis, in a form that can readily be implemented in any suitable programming language, or within a spreadsheet. The Plitt model is also presented in similar form. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword Engineering, Chemical
Mining & Mineral Processing
Small-diameter Hydrocyclones
Efficiency Curves
Q-Index Code C1
Additional Notes Hydrocyclones '03

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 37 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 48 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 15 Aug 2007, 03:00:28 EST