The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator

Plooy, Annaliese M., Hill, Andrew, Horswill, Mark S., Cresp, Alanna St. G., Karamatic, Rozemary, Riek, Stephan, Wallis, Guy M., Burgess-Limerick, Robin, Hewett, David G. and Watson, Marcus O. (2016) The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Endoscopy International Open, 4 12: E1252-E1260. doi:10.1055/s-0042-114773


Author Plooy, Annaliese M.
Hill, Andrew
Horswill, Mark S.
Cresp, Alanna St. G.
Karamatic, Rozemary
Riek, Stephan
Wallis, Guy M.
Burgess-Limerick, Robin
Hewett, David G.
Watson, Marcus O.
Title The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator
Journal name Endoscopy International Open   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 2196-9736
2364-3722
Publication date 2016-01-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-114773
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 4
Issue 12
Start page E1252
End page E1260
Total pages 9
Place of publication Stuttgart, Germany
Publisher Georg Thieme
Collection year 2017
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background and study aims: Prior research supports the validity of performance measures derived from the use of a physical model colonoscopy simulator– the Kyoto Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model (Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) – for assessing insertion skill. However, its use as a training tool has received little research attention. We assessed the efficacy of a brief structured program to develop basic colonoscope insertion skill through unsupervised practice on the model.

Participants and methods: This was a training study with pretesting and post-testing. Thirtytwo colonoscopy novices completed an 11-hour training regime in which they practiced cases on the model in a colonoscopy simulation research laboratory. They also attempted a series of test cases before and after training. For each outcome measure (completion rates, time to cecum and peak force applied to the model), we compared trainees’ post-test performance with the untrained novices and experienced colonoscopists from a previously-reported validation study.

Results: Compared with untrained novices, trained novices had higher completion rates and shorter times to cecum overall (Ps< .001), but were out-performed by the experienced colonoscopists on these metrics (Ps< .001). Nevertheless, their performance was generally closer to that of the experienced group. Overall, trained novices did not differ from either experience-level comparison group in the peak forces they applied (P> .05). We also present the results broken down by case.

Conclusions: The program can be used to teach trainees basic insertion skill in a more or less selfdirected way. Individuals who have completed the program (or similar training on the model) are better prepared to progress to supervised live cases.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 02 Nov 2016, 21:17:37 EST by Sandrine Ducrot on behalf of School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences