Safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in solid-organ transplant candidates: a systematic review

Matthew P. Wallen, Tina L. Skinner, Toby G. Pavey, Adrian Hall, Graeme A. Macdonald and Jeff S. Coombes (2016) Safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in solid-organ transplant candidates: a systematic review. Transplantation Reviews, . doi:10.1016/j.trre.2016.07.004

Author Matthew P. Wallen
Tina L. Skinner
Toby G. Pavey
Adrian Hall
Graeme A. Macdonald
Jeff S. Coombes
Title Safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in solid-organ transplant candidates: a systematic review
Journal name Transplantation Reviews   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0955-470X
Publication date 2016-07-19
Year available 2016
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.trre.2016.07.004
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Total pages 40
Place of publication Maryland Heights, MO, United States
Publisher W.B. Saunders
Collection year 2017
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background: Patients awaiting solid-organ transplantation may be encouraged to undertake exercise training to improve pre- and post-transplant outcomes. However, the safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in this population remain unclear.

Methods: All randomized, non-randomized and non-controlled trials of exercise training interventions in solid-organ transplant candidates were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess procedural quality. Safety was defined as the number of reported adverse events during exercise training. Adherence was evaluated from session attendance, and efficacy as changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), exercise capacity, muscular strength, healthrelated quality of life (HR-QoL) and lung function.

Results: Eleven studies involving 874 patients were included: four randomized controlled, one non-randomized controlled and six non-controlled trials. Six studies included heart transplant candidates and five involved patients awaiting lung transplantation. Three trials included aerobic-only training, one incorporated resistance-only exercise and seven combined modalities. Twelve adverse events were reported with four due to exercise, although methods to collect these data were often omitted. Exercise adherence ranged from 82.5-100%, but was poorly described. No significant between–group changes attributable to exercise training were demonstrated. However, significant within-group improvements in CRF, exercise capacity, muscular strength, lung function and HR-QoL were observed.

Conclusions: Patients awaiting heart or lung transplant appear to tolerate exercise training despite the larger number of adverse events compared to other high-risk populations. Exercise training demonstrated within-group benefits for several outcomes, with no significant between-group differences. Randomized controlled trials with sufficient statistical power are required for all solid-organ transplant candidate.
Keyword Exercise training
Solid-organ transplant candidate
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 02 Aug 2016, 15:47:08 EST by Sandrine Ducrot on behalf of School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences