In defense of alternative advice and counsel and the ways in which it can be researched

Cross D.G., Sheehan P.W. and Khan J.A. (1981) In defense of alternative advice and counsel and the ways in which it can be researched. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 5: 734-737. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.49.5.734


Author Cross D.G.
Sheehan P.W.
Khan J.A.
Title In defense of alternative advice and counsel and the ways in which it can be researched
Journal name Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0022-006X
Publication date 1981
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.49.5.734
Volume 49
Issue 5
Start page 734
End page 737
Total pages 4
Subject 3203 Clinical Psychology
2738 Psychiatry and Mental health
Abstract Argues that F. R. Wilson's (see record 1982-01645-001) comments on the present authors' (see record 1980-32896-001) study mistakenly define it as one that is concerned with the causal influence of the variable alternative counsel. Additional data on follow-up are presented that help to substantiate the claim that the effects of therapy in the authors' study were real and lasting. (6 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Keyword use of alternative counsel while attending behavioral vs insight vs no therapy, reply to critique by F. R. Wilson
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: Scopus Import
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 28 Jun 2016, 03:21:32 EST by System User