Dichoptic viewing methods for binocular rivalry research: prospects for large-scale clinical and genetic studies

Law, Phillip C. F., Paton, Bryan K., Thomson, Richard H., Liu, Guang B., Miller, Steven M. and Ngo, Trung T. (2013) Dichoptic viewing methods for binocular rivalry research: prospects for large-scale clinical and genetic studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16 6: 1033-1078. doi:10.1017/thg.2013.76


Author Law, Phillip C. F.
Paton, Bryan K.
Thomson, Richard H.
Liu, Guang B.
Miller, Steven M.
Ngo, Trung T.
Title Dichoptic viewing methods for binocular rivalry research: prospects for large-scale clinical and genetic studies
Journal name Twin Research and Human Genetics   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1832-4274
1839-2628
Publication date 2013-12
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1017/thg.2013.76
Volume 16
Issue 6
Start page 1033
End page 1078
Total pages 46
Place of publication Cambridge, United Kingdom
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Binocular rivalry (BR) is an intriguing phenomenon that occurs when two different images are presented, one to each eye, resulting in alternation or rivalry between the percepts. The phenomenon has been studied for nearly 200 years, with renewed and intensive investigation over recent decades. The rate of perceptual switching has long been known to vary widely between individuals but to be relatively stable within individuals. A recent twin study demonstrated that individual variation in BR rate is under substantial genetic control, a finding that also represented the first report, using a large study, of genetic contribution for any post-retinal visual processing phenomenon. The twin study had been prompted by earlier work showing BR rate was slow in the heritable psychiatric condition, bipolar disorder (BD). Together, these studies suggested that slow BR may represent an endophenotype for BD, and heralded the advent of modern clinical and genetic studies of rivalry. This new focus has coincided with rapid advances in 3D display technology, but despite such progress, specific development of technology for rivalry research has been lacking. This review therefore compares different display methods for BR research across several factors, including viewing parameters, image quality, equipment cost, compatibility with other investigative methods, subject group, and sample size, with a focus on requirements specific to large-scale clinical and genetic studies. It is intended to be a resource for investigators new to BR research, such as clinicians and geneticists, and to stimulate the development of 3D display technology for advancing interdisciplinary studies of rivalry.
Keyword Binocular rivalry
Clinical disorders
Dichoptic presentation
Genetic studies
Human factors
Stereoscopic 3D display technology
Technique compatibility
Twin studies
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 07 Jun 2016, 17:01:04 EST by System User on behalf of Learning and Research Services (UQ Library)