Classroom standing desks and sedentary behavior: a systematic review

Minges, Karl E., Chao, Ariana M., Irwin, Melinda L., Owen, Neville, Park, Chorong, Whittemore, Robin and Salmon, Jo (2016) Classroom standing desks and sedentary behavior: a systematic review. Pediatrics, 137 2: 1-18. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3087

Author Minges, Karl E.
Chao, Ariana M.
Irwin, Melinda L.
Owen, Neville
Park, Chorong
Whittemore, Robin
Salmon, Jo
Title Classroom standing desks and sedentary behavior: a systematic review
Journal name Pediatrics   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1098-4275
Publication date 2016-02-01
Year available 2016
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1542/peds.2015-3087
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 137
Issue 2
Start page 1
End page 18
Total pages 18
Place of publication Elk Grove Village, IL United States
Publisher American Academy of Pediatrics
Collection year 2017
Language eng
Formatted abstract
CONTEXT: Reducing sedentary behaviors, or time spent sitting, is an important target for health promotion in children. Standing desks in schools may be a feasible, modifiable, and acceptable environmental strategy to this end.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of school-based standing desk interventions on sedentary behavior and physical activity, health-related outcomes, and academic and behavioral outcomes in school-aged children.

DATA SOURCES: Ovid Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Global Health, and CINAHL.

STUDY SELECTION: Full-text peer-reviewed journal publications written in English; samples of school-aged youth (5–18 years of age); study designs including the same participants at baseline and follow-up; and use of a standing desk as a component of the intervention.

DATA EXTRACTION: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS: Eight studies satisfied selection criteria and used quasi-experimental (n = 4), randomized controlled trial (n = 3), and pre–post, no control (n = 1) designs. When examined, time spent standing increased in all studies (effect sizes: 0.38–0.71), while sitting time decreased from a range of 59 to 64 minutes (effect sizes: 0.27–0.49). Some studies reported increased physical activity and energy expenditure and improved classroom behavior.

LIMITATIONS: One-half of the studies had nonrandomized designs, and most were pilot or feasibility studies.

CONCLUSIONS: This initial evidence supports integrating standing desks into the classroom environment; this strategy has the potential to reduce sitting time and increase standing time among elementary schoolchildren. Additional research is needed to determine the impact of standing desks on academic performance and precursors of chronic disease risk.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: HERDC Pre-Audit
School of Public Health Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 01 Mar 2016, 00:50:17 EST by System User on behalf of School of Public Health